Desarrollo del debate teórico en torno al nacionalismo y la nación a través del esquema kuhniano

Guillermo Reyes Pascual

doi:10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4006

Autores/as

Guillermo Reyes Pascual University of Kent https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7026-4242

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4006

Palabras clave:

Esquema kuhniano, nacionalismo, nación, revolución científica, paradigmas

Resumen

Mucho se ha escrito para analizar y dar sentido a dos términos que vienen intrínsecamente unidos, el nacionalismo y la nación. La principal consecuencia positiva de esto ha sido un vasto debate teórico sobre el nacionalismo y la nación que indudablemente los enriquece. La principal consecuencia negativa, por su parte, es que el desarrollo del propio debate, y cómo se ha ido formando, ha recibido poca atención. El objetivo de este artículo es exponer cómo este debate se ha sido desarrollado alrededor de los cuatros paradigmas clásicos del nacionalismo. Para ello, se aplica el esquema kuhniano para saber cuándo, cómo, y por qué se articularon estos paradigmas clásicos en torno a estos dos términos. Con esto se pretende profundizar en la explicación histórica de Moreno Almendral (2015), pero desde la filosofía de la ciencia, desarrollando una visión mucho más detallada del debate en torno al nacionalismo y la nación.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.

Armstrong, J. (1982). Nations before Nationalism. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.

Beiner, R. (1999). Theorizing Nationalism. Albany: State University of New York.

Berghe, P. van der (1978). Race and ethnicity: a sociobiological perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1 (4), pp. 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1978.9993241

Berghe, P. van der (1988). Ethnicity and the sociobiology debate. En: Rex, J. y Mason, D. (eds.), Theories of Ethnic and Race Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557828.013

Biesta, G. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. En: Taskakkori, A. y Teddlie, C. (eds.). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 95-118. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n4

Bird, A. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and its Significance: An Essay Review of the Fiftieth Anniversary Edition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63 (4), pp. 859-883. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs031

Breuilly, J. (2010). Bringing History Back into Nationalism. En: Aktar, A., Kizilyürek, N. y Özkirimli, U. (eds.). Nationalism in the Troubled Triangle. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297326_1

Buchwald, J. Z. y Smith, G. E. (1997). Thomas S. Kuhn, 1922-1996. Philosophy of Science, 64 (2), pp. 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1086/392557

Carr, E. (1945). Nationalism and After. London: MacMillan.

Chalmers, A. (1982). What is This Thing Called Science? St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. y Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge Falmer.

Conversi, D. (2007). Mapping the Field Theories of Nationalism and the Ethnosymbolic Approach. En: Leoussi, A. S. y Grosby, S. (eds.). Nationalism and Ethnosymbolism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 15-30.

Day, G. y Thompson, A. (2004). Theorizing Nationalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07120-0

Denzin, N. K y Lincoln, Y. (2000). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. En: Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research: Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 1-29.

Deutsch, K. W. (1953). Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Eisenstadt, S. (1965). Modernisation: Protest and Change. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Finlayson, A. (1998). Psychology, Psychoanalysis, and Theories of Nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 4 (2), pp. 145- 162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00145.x

Firinci Orman, T. (2016). Paradigms as a Central Concept in Thomas Kuhn's Thought. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6 (10), pp. 47-52.

Fishman, J. (1972). Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers.

Fulcher, J. y Scott, J. (1999). Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Geertz, C. (1963). Old Societies and New States. New Yok: Free Press.

Gellner, E. (1964). Thought and Change. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Giddens, A. (1985). The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gillingham, J. (1992). The Beginning of English Imperialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 5, pp. 392-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.1992.tb00033.x

Greenfeld, L. (1992). Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Hastings, A. (1997). The Construction of Nationhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612107

Hayes, C. (1931). The Historical Evolution of Modern Nationalism. Nueva York: Smith.

Hechter, M. (1975). Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, 1536-1966. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Hobsbawm, E. y Ranger, T. (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1990) Kuhn's Conception of Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21 (3), pp. 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-T

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17343

Hutchinson, J. (1987). The Dynamics of Cultural Nationalism. London: Routledge.

Kedourie, E. (1960). Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kedourie, E. (1971). Nationalism in Asia and Africa. Oxford: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Kohn, H. (1944). The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in its Origin and Background. Nueva York: The MacMillan Company.

Kohn, H. (1967). Prelude to Nation-State. Princeton, New Jersey: D. van Nostrand Company.

Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lawrence, P. (2005). Nationalism. History and Theory. Edinburgh: Pearson Longman.

Male?evic, S. y Pavasovic Tro?t, T. (2018). Nation-State and Nationalism. En: Ritzer, G. y Rojek, C. (eds.). Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. London: Wiley Blackwell.

Malone, M. (1993). Kuhn Reconstructed: Incommensurability without Relativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 24 (1), pp. 69- 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(93)90025-F

Marcum, J. A. (2005). Thomas Kuhn's Revolution. London: Continuum.

Marcum, J. A. (2013). From Paradigm to Disciplinary Matrix and Exemplar. En: Kindi, V. y Arabatzis, T. (eds.). Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. London: Routledge, pp. 41-63.

Masterman, M. (1970). The Nature of a Paradigm. En: Lakatos, I. Musgrave, A. (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434.008

Moreno Almendral, R. (2015). El debate académico sobre nación y nacionalismo desde los orígenes hasta la consolidación del predominio anglosajón. Arbor, 191 (775): a272. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.775n5011

Moulines, C. U. (2015). Popper y Kuhn. Dos gigantes de la filosofía de la ciencia del Siglo XX. Madrid: Batiscafo.

Nagel. E. (1961). The structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Nairn, T. (1977). The Break-up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism. London: New Left Books.

Özkirimli, U. (2010). Theories of Nationalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Özkirimli, U. y Grosby, S. (2007). Nationalism Theory Debate: The Antiquity of Nations? Nations and Nationalism, 13, pp. 523-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2007.00297.x

Palti, E. J. (2002). The Nation as a Problem. Historians and the National Question. History and Theory, 40 (3), pp. 324- 346. https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00171

Poli, R. (2010). Ontology: The Categorical Stance. En: Poli, R. Seibt, J. (eds.). Theory and Application of Ontology: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Springer, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8845-1_1

Popkewitz, S. T., Tabacnick, B. R. y Zeichner, K. M. (1979). Dulling the Senses: Research in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 30 (5), pp. 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717903000527

Roger, A. (2001). Les Grandes Théories du Nationalisme. Paris: Dalloz-Sirey.

Roschwald, A. (2006). The Endurance of Nationalism: Ancient Roots and Modern Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, D. (1993). The Development of the Social Sciences. En: Farr, J. y Seidelman, R. (eds.). Discipline and History. Political Science in the United States. Chicago: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 81-106.

Samian, A. L. (1994). The Impact of Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions on Sociology of Science. Akademika, 44 (1), pp. 125-136.

Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social Research. Melbourne: Macmillan Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20901-5

Shils, E. (1957). Primordial, Personal, Sacred, and Civil Ties. British Journal of Sociology, 8 (2), pp. 130-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/587365

Smith, A. (1971). Theories of Nationalism. London: Duckworth.

Smith, A. (1983). Nationalism and Classical Social Theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 34 (1), pp. 19-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/590606

Smith, A. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Smith, A. (1992). Nationalism and the Historians. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, XXXIII (1-2), pp. 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/002071529203300105

Smith, A. (1995). Gastronomy or Geology? The Role of Nationalism in the Reconstruction of Nations. Nations and Nationalism, 1, pp. 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.1995.00003.x

Smith, A. (1999). Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, A. (2000a). Nationalism and Modernism. London: Routledge.

Smith, A. (2000b). The Nation in History: Historiographical Debates about Ethnicity and Nationalism. Hanover: University Press of New England.

Smith, A. (2001). Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Smith, A. (2009). Ethno-symbolism and Nationalism. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876558

Spencer, P. y Wollman, H. (2005). Nations and Nationalism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Swerdlow, M. N. (2004). An Essay on Thomas Kuhn's First Scientific Revolution, The Copernican Revolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 148 (1), pp. 64-120.

Synder, L. L. (1954). Meaning of Nationalism. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Tilly, C. (1975). The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Vásquez, J. A. (1998). The Politics of Power: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, M. J. (2001). Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wolf, K. (1976). Hans Kohn's Liberal Nationalism: The Historian as Prophet. Journal of the History of Ideas, 37 (4), pp. 651- 672. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709029

Worsley, P. (1964). The Third World. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Wray, K. B. (2011). Kuhn and the Discovery of Paradigms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41 (3), pp. 380-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109359778

Yack, B. (2012). Nationalism and the Moral Psychology of Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226944685.001.0001