Política Nacional de Ciência Aberta em Portugal: recomendações do grupo de trabalho sobre Avaliação da ciência

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2021.799006

Palabras clave:

Ciência Aberta, Avaliação da ciência, Política nacional, Portugal, ciencia abierta, evaluación de la ciencia, política nacional

Resumen


El 24 de marzo de 2016, por medio de la Resolución del Consejo de Ministros n. 21/2016, el Gobierno de Portugal, a través del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Educación Superior (MCTES), anunció el compromiso de la ciencia con los principios y prácticas de Ciencia abierta. La misma resolución obligó al MCTES a crear un Grupo de Trabajo Interministerial con la misión de presentar una propuesta de Plan Estratégico para la implementación de una Política Nacional de Ciencia Abierta. El grupo de trabajo incluyó cuatro subgrupos: acceso abierto y datos abiertos, infraestructura y preservación digital, evaluación científica y responsabilidad social.

En este artículo se presenta el conjunto de recomendaciones que el subgrupo de evaluación científica, en articulación con los demás, considera fundamentales para la implementación de prácticas de ciencia abierta, dirigidas a los agentes políticos, así como a las entidades productoras, evaluadoras y financiadoras de la ciencia.

[pt] Em 24 de março de 2016, através da Resolução do Conselho de Ministros nº 21/2016, o Governo de Portugal, através do Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (MCTES), anunciou o compromisso da ciência com os princípios e práticas da ciência aberta. A mesma resolução mandata o MCTES a criar um grupo de trabalhointerministerial com a missão de apresentar uma proposta de Plano Estratégico para a implementação de uma Política Nacional de Ciência Aberta. O grupo de trabalho incluiu quatro subgrupos - acesso aberto e dados abertos, infraestruturas e preservação digital, avaliação científica e responsabilidade social científica.

Neste artigo apresenta-se o conjunto de recomendações que o subgrupo de avaliação científica, em articulação com os restantes, entende serem fundamentais para a implementação de práticas de ciência aberta dirigindo-se a agentes políticos, bem como a entidades produtoras, avaliadoras e financiadoras de ciência.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications (Plan S) (2018). cOAlition S. https:// www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Plan_S.pdf

Clements, Anna; Darroch, Peter y Green, John (2017). Snowball Metrics – providing a robust methodology to inform research strategy – but do they help? Procedia Computer Science, 106: 11-18.

DORA (2012). The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). USA: American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). http://www.ascb.org/dora/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf

European Commission (2016). Open innovation, open science, open to the world: A vision for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission (2017). Open Science Policy Platform Recommendations. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2777/958647

European University Association (2015). EUA ’s Open Access checklist for universities: a practical guide on implementation. Bruxelas: European University Association. http://www.eua.be/Libraries/research/open-access-report_v3.pdf?sfvrsn=0

European University Association (2016). EUA Roadmap on Open Access to research publications. Bruxelas: European University Association. http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepage--list/eua-roadmap-on-open-access-to--research-publications.pdf?sfvrsn=8

European University Association (2017a). Towards Full Open Access in 2020 Aims and recommendations for university leaders and National Rectors’ Conferences. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/417:-towards-full-open-access-in-2020.html

European University Association (2017b). Towards Open Access to Research Data Aims and recommendations for university leaders and National Rectors’ Conferences on Research Data Management and Text and Data Mining. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/414:-towards-open-access-to-research-data.html

European University Association (2017c). EUA Statement on Open Science to EU Institutions and National Governments. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/412:eua--statement-on-open-science-to-eu-institutions-and-national-governments.html

European University Association (2018). EUA Roadmap on Research Assessment in the Transition to Open Science. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/316:eua--roadmap-on-research-assessment-in--the-transition-to-open-science.html

Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; de Rijcke, Sarah y Rafols, Ismael (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520 (7548): 429–431. Wouters.

Moed, Henk F. (2017). Applied Evaluative Informetrics. Berlin: Springer. National Information Standards Organization (NISO) (2016). Outputs of the NISO Alternative Assessment Project. Baltimore, MD: NISO. http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/17091/NISO%20RP-25-2016%20Outputs%20of%20the%20NISO%20Alternative%20Assessment%20Project.pdf

Wilsdon, James R.; Bar-Ilan, Judit; Frodeman, Robert; Lex, Elisabeth; Peters, Isabella y Wouters, Paul (2017). Next-generation metrics: Responsible metrics and evaluation for open science - European Commission Expert Group on Altmetrics. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Working Group on Rewards under Open Science - European Commission. (2017). Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science Practices Rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing Open Science. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Wouters, Paul; Ràfols, Ismael; Oancea, Alis; Kamerlin, Shina C.; Holbrook, J. Britt y Jacob, Merle (2019). Indicator Frameworks for Fostering Open Knowledge Practices in Science and Scholarship. Publications Office of the European Union.

Publicado

2021-04-13

Cómo citar

Ribeiro, L. ., Borges, M. M. ., & Silva, D. . (2021). Política Nacional de Ciência Aberta em Portugal: recomendações do grupo de trabalho sobre Avaliação da ciência. Arbor, 197(799), a591. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2021.799006

Número

Sección

Artículos