Interdisciplinariedad y redes epistemológicas de la ciencia en Internet

Karim Gherab Martín

doi:10.3989/arbor.2009.i737.317

Authors

Karim Gherab Martín Harvard University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2009.i737.317

Keywords:

Interdisciplinarity, open science, open access, digital repositories, scholar journals, trading zone, tags, keywords, language, discourse

Abstract

The expression open science is characterized and related with open science, and it is argued that a good design of digital repositories and their connexion through Internet may dramatically increase interdisciplinarity. Also, such repositories are characterized as trading zones where scholar journals could harvest papers they should publish as unitary discourses, yet in the context of a proposed model that is very different compared to usual current publishers’ practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adair, W. C. (1955): “Citation Indexes for Scientific Literature”, American Documentation, 6, pp. 31-32. doi:10.1002/asi.5090060105

Bailey Jr, Ch. W. (2006): “What is open access?”, en N. Jacobs (ed.), pp. 13-26.

Butler, Declan (2005): “Science in the web age: joint efforts”, Nature, vol. 438, n.º 531, December 1st.

Foster, Ian (2005): “Service-Oriented Science”, Science, 308, May 6, pp. 814-817.

Galison, Peter L. (1997): Image and Logic: a material culture of microphysics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Gherab, Karim (2008): “Writing Science in the 21st Century: From Technologies of Recommendation to Industries of Innovative Reuse”, The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, volume 4.

González Quirós, José Luis y Gherab Martín, Karim (2006): El templo del saber: hacia la biblioteca digital universal, Deusto, Barcelona.

González Quirós, José Luis y Gherab Martín, Karim (2009): “Arguments for an Open Model of e-Science”, en Bill Cope y Angus Phillips (eds.) (2009): The Future of the Academic Journal, Chandos Publishing, Oxford, UK.

Guédon, Jean Claude (2001): “In Oldenburg’s Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing”, disponible en http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/mmproceedings/138guedon.shtml.

Howe, Jeff (2006): “The Rise of Crowdsourcing”, Wired, June 14, disponible en http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html.

Jacobs, Neil (ed.) (2006): Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects, Chandos Publishing, Oxford.

Lynch, Clifford (2006): “Open computation: beyond human reader-centric views of scholarly literatures”, en N. Jacobs (ed.) (2006), pp. 185-193, disponible en http://www.cni.org/staff/cliffpubs/OpenComputation.htm.

Merton, Robert K. (1973): La sociología de la ciencia, I y II, Alianza, Madrid.

Nature (2006): “Overview: Nature’s peer review trial”, doi:10.1038/nature05535, December 2006, disponible en http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html.

O’Reilly, Tim (2005): “What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”, disponible en http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228.

Polanyi, Michael (1969): Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

Royal Society (2005): “Royal Society warns hasty ‘open access’ moves may damage science”, disponible en https://web.archive.org/web/20060614042900/http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=3881.

Shadbolt, N.; Brody, T.; Carr, L. y Harnad, S. (2006): “The Open Research Web”, en N. Jacobs (ed.) (2006), pp. 195-208, disponible en http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12453/.

Ziman, John (1984): An Introduction to Science Studies: The Philosophical and Social Aspects of Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.