Cultura científica comunitaria para una pandemia. La COVID persistente

José Manuel  de Cózar Escalante; Javier  Gómez-Ferri

doi:10.3989/arbor.2022.806003

Autores/as

José Manuel de Cózar Escalante Universidad de La Laguna https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7057-3830
Javier Gómez-Ferri Universitat de València https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0580-6022

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2022.806003

Palabras clave:

Cultura científica comunitaria, ciencia ciudadana, comprensión pública de la ciencia, COVID persistente, ciencia post-normal

Resumen

A pesar de algunos antecedentes dispersos y excepciones, existe una manifiesta laguna en la literatura sobre el concepto de cultura científica comunitaria. Con esa expresión nos referimos a situaciones en las cuales unos ciudadanos perciben un problema, se agrupan, organizan, comunican y ponen en común sus recursos para buscar, evaluar y producir conocimiento científico con el fin de encarar dicho problema. En este trabajo realizamos una propuesta de caracterización de la cultura científica comunitaria. Posteriormente, procedemos a aplicarla y contrastarla respecto del caso de los colectivos de afectados por la COVID persistente. La metodología empleada se ha basado en el análisis documental.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Alwan, Nisreen A. (2020). A negative COVID-19 test does not mean recovery. Nature, 584, 170. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02335-z PMid:32782377

Assaf, Gina et al. (2020). What Does COVID-19 Recovery Actually Look Like? An Analysis of the Prolonged COVID-19 Symptoms Survey by Patient-Led Research Team. medRxiv. https://patientresearchcovid19.com/research/report-1/

Brown, Phil (1992). Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(3): 267-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137356 PMid:1401851

Brown, Phil (1997). Popular Epidemiology Revisited. Current Sociology, 45(3): 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139297045003008

Callard, Felicity y Perego, Elisa (2021). How and why patients made Long Covid. Social Science & Medicine 268, 113426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426 PMid:33199035 PMCid:PMC7539940

Callon, Michel y Rabeharisoa, Vololona (2008). The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life. Lessons from the French Association of neuromuscular disease patients. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2): 230-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311264

Collins, Francis (2020). Citizen Scientists Take on the Callenge of Long-Haul COVID-19. NIH Director's Blog, 3 septiembre 2020. https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2020/09/03/citizen-scientists-take-on-the-challenge-of-long-haul-covid-19/

Corburn, Jason (2005). Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6494.001.0001

Council of Canadian Academies (2014). Science Culture. Where Canada Stands. Ottawa, https://cca-reports.ca/reports/science-culture-where-canada-stands/

Davis, Hannah E. et al. (2021). Characterizing Long COVID in an International Cohort: 7 Months of Symptoms and Their Impact. EClinicalMedicine, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019 PMid:34308300 PMCid:PMC8280690

De Cózar Escalante, José Manuel y Gómez Ferri, Javier (2021). Community-based scientific culture: wave or particle? En: Ana Muñoz van den Eynde y Carmelo Polino (Coords.), Pocket Science. The Praxeological Dimension of Scientific Culture (pp. 43-58). Madrid: CIEMAT.

De Kerckhove, Derrick (1995). La piel de la cultura: investigando la nueva realidad electrónica. Barcelona: Gedisa

Durkheim, Emile (1898). Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morales, VI, 273-300.

Epstein, Steven (1995). The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 20(4), 408-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000402 PMid:11653331

Epstein, Steven (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

Funtowicz, Silvio y Cecilia Hidalgo (2021). Pandemia posnormal: las múltiples voces del conocimiento. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global, 154, 109-122.

Funtowicz, Silvio y Ravetz, Jerome (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L

Funtowicz, Silvio y Ravetz, Jerome (2003). Post-normal science. En: International Society for Ecological Economics (ed.), Online Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics. https://isecoeco.org/pdf/pstnormsc.pdf

Godin, Benoit y Gingras, Yves (2000). What Is Scientific and Technological Culture and How Is It Measured. A Multidimensional Model. Public Understanding of Science, 9(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/303

Gómez Ferri, Javier (2012). Cultura: sus significados y diferentes modelos de cultura científica, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 58, 15-33 (1022-6508) - OEI/CAEU, http://www.rieoei.org/rie58a01.pdf https://doi.org/10.35362/rie580471

Gorna, Robin et al. (2021). Long COVID guidelines need to reflect lived experience. The Lancet, 397, 455-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32705-7 PMid:33357467

Guerrero Caballero, Silvia., y Bilbao Fernández, Sonia (2021). Persistencia del virus SARS-CoV-2 como causa etiológica de la sintomatología de larga duración en pacientes con COVID-19 persistente.Medicina General y de Familia, 10(2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.24038/mgyf.2021.027

Haas, Peter M. (1989). Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution. International Organization, 43(3), 377-403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300032975

Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Boston: The MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001

Laspra, Belén (2018). La alfabetización científica. Madrid: OEI-Catarata.

Laspra, Belén y Emilio Muñoz (coords.) (2014). Culturas científicas e innovadoras, progreso social, Buenos Aires: Eudeba.

Lave, Jane y Wanger, Etienne (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Lee, Stuart y Roth, Wolff-Michael (2003). Science and the "Good Citizen": Community Based Scientific Literacy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903028003003

Lévy, Pierre (1994). L'Intelligence collective. París: La Découverte.

Lokugamage, Amali U., Taylor, Sharon y Rayner, Clare (2020). Patients' experiences of "longcovid" are missing from the NHS narrative. The bmj, 10 julio. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/07/10/patients-experiences-of-longcovid-are-missing-from-the-nhs-narrative/

López Cerezo, José Antonio (2005). Participación ciudadana y cultura científica, Arbor CLXXXI, (715), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2005.i715.417

López Cerezo, José Antonio (2017). Comprender y comunicar la ciencia. Madrid: OEI-Catarata.

López-León, Sandra, Wegman-Ostrosky, Talia, Perelman, Carol, Sepulveda, Rosalinda, Rebolledo, Paulina A., Cuapio, Angelica, y Villapol, Sonia (2021). More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. SSRN 3769978. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3769978

Lowenstein, Fiona (2020). We Need to Talk About What Coronavirus Recoveries Look, Like, The New York Times, 13 abril 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/13/opinion/coronavirus-recovery.html

McCorkell, Lisa et al. (2021). Patient-Led Research Collaborative: embedding patients in the Long COVID narrative. PAIN Reports, 6(1): pe913. https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000913 PMid:33987484 PMCid:PMC8112577

Meagher, Timothy (2021). Long COVID - An Early Perspective. Journal of Insurance Medicine, 49(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.17849/insm-49-1-1-5.1 PMid:33784738

Moscovici, Serge (1961). El psicoanálisis, su imagen y su público. Buenos Aires: Editorial Huemul.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nonaka, Ikujiro. y Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3

Núñez Castro, Andrés y Gómez Ferri, Javier (2022). ¿Qué es esa cosa llamada cultura científica comunitaria? Una aproximación y un modelo de análisis. Techno Review. International Technology, Science and Society Review 11(2). https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4437

Perego, Elisa, y Callard, Felicity (2021, February 9). Patient-made Long Covid changed COVID-19 (and the production of science, too), SocArXiv https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n8yp6

Rabeharisoa, Vololona, Moreira, Tiago, y Akrich, Madeleine (2014). Evidence-based activism: Patients', users' and activists' groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties, 9(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.2

Roth, Wolff-Michael (2003). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210134600

Roth, Wolff-Michael y Lee, Stuart (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11(1), 33-56 https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/1/302