The rise of crowdfunding in the cultural field. A new architecture for shared production or simply a reformulation of fragility and precariousness?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.791n1003

Keywords:

crowdfunding, culture, social return, public value, Internet, shared production

Abstract


Crowdfunding experiences, especially in the cultural field, have expanded in an unthinkable manner in the last few years. This phenomenon is linked to the major transformation of the Internet in many aspects of social, economic and political activity. Together with private and commercial production, new spaces for production and social exchange have been created. However, it is crucial to verify the degree to which these new spaces of technical and economic feasibility find the right results in social return and its practices. Does the rise in crowdfunding in the cultural field represent a new-shared production or is it merely a fragile and precarious reformulation of the sector? By analysing the activities of several crowdfunding platforms this article answers these questions and proposes four dimensions to study the social return and public value of crowdfunding. We conclude that crowdfunding not only incorporates innovation to the well-established intermediary dynamics of the cultural sector, but can also reproduce the institutional rules and status quo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. y Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (5), pp. 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003

Benkler, Y. (2015). La riqueza de las redes. Barcelona: Icaria.

Bille, T. (2012). The Scandinavian Approach to the Experience Economy: Does It Make Sense? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18 (1), pp. 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2011.561924

Bourdieu, P. (1999). Cuestiones de Sociología. Madrid: Istmo.

Bustamante, E. (2013). Espa-a: la cultura en tiempos de crisis. Madrid: Fundación Alternativas.

Fuster Morell, M. y Subirats, J. (2012). Més enllà d'Internet com a eina "martell" -eina de la vella política: Cap un nou Policy Making? Barcelona: Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya.

Fuster Morell, M., Subirats Humet, J., Berlinguer, M., Martínez, R. y Salcedo, J. (2014). Procomún digital y cultura libre. Barcelona: Icaria.

Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (1), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005

Putnam, R. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collage and Revival of American Community. Nueva York: Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Rifkin, J. (2014). La sociedad de coste marginal cero. Barcelona: Paidos.

Subirats, J. (2011). Otra sociedad, ¿otra política? Barcelona: Icaria.

Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J. y Xu, Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information and Management, 51 (4), pp. 488-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003

Otros recursos

Anuario de Estadísticas Culturales 2014. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. [En línea]. Disponible en https://es.calameo.com/ read/000075335d1b5afb9cde1

Dans, E. (2013, 22 de junio). Los problemas de Kickstarter. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://www.enriquedans.com/2013/06/ los-problemas-de-kickstarter.html

Massolution. Crowd Powered Business. 2013CF. The crowdfunding industry report. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://reports.crowdsourcing.org/index.php?route=product/ product&path=0&product_id=58

Mercado de Crowdfunding en Espa-a y Latinoamérica 2013 (InfoCrowdsourcing). Marzo de 2014. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://www.informeticplus.com/ mercado-de-crowdfunding-en-espana-y-latinoamerica-2013-infocrowdsurcing

Published

2019-03-30

How to Cite

Barbieri, N., Fina, X., Partal, A., & Subirats, J. (2019). The rise of crowdfunding in the cultural field. A new architecture for shared production or simply a reformulation of fragility and precariousness?. Arbor, 195(791), a490. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.791n1003

Issue

Section

Articles