Psychology of the creative subject/innovator and the new forms of life and reproduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.752n6006Keywords:
Innovation, creativity, knowledge society, information SocietyAbstract
Modern psychology has generated a great effort and huge research resources on the field of creative/innovative personality. The positivist epistemological and methodological research frameworks have been the predominant line on research methodology. All those resources and research commitment have not obtained yet any conclusive results and even less satisfactory results. The combination of creativity-innovation and productivity from the dominant psychological-managerial discourses set the direction of the predominant research. The various meanings that connote the terms “Information Society” and “Knowledge Society” entail each one of them separately different meanings and implications in relation to the innovative action of consumers and users.
Downloads
References
Agarwal, R. y Karahana, E. (2000): “Time flies when you are having fun: cognitve absortion and beliefs about information usage”, MIS Quarterly, 24: 665-694. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250951
Amabile, T. M.; Hadley, C. N. y Kramer, S. J. (2002): “Creativity under de gun”, Harvard Bus. Rev., 80: 52-61.
Amabile, T. M.; Barsade, S. G.; Mueller, J. S. y Staw, B. M. (2005): “Affect and creativity at work”, Admi. Sci. Q., 50: 367- 403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
Amadi-Echendu, J. E. (2007): “Thinking Styles of technical knowledge workers in the systems of innovation paradigm”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74: 1204-1214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.09.002
Ambrosi, A.; Peugeot, V. y Pimienta, D. (2005): Word Matters: multicultural perspectives on information societies, C & F Éditions.
Brophy, D. R. (1998): “Understanding, measuring, and enhanding individual creative problem-solving efforts”, Creativity Research Journal, 11: 123-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_4
Brophy, D. R. (2006): “A comparison of individual and group effots to creatively solve contrasting types problems”, Creativity Research Journal, 18: 293- 315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_6
Burch, Sally (2004): Se cayó el sistema. Enredos de la sociedad de la información, Quito: ALAI.
Cardon, D. (2005): “Innovation by usage”, en Ambrosi et al., World Matters: multicultural perspectives on information societies, C & F Editions.
Clapham, M. M. (2001): “The effects of affect manipulation and information exposure on divergent thinking”, Creatitiviy Research Journal, 13: 335-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_11
Courrier, Y. (2003): Société de l’Information et technologies. http://www.unesco.org/webworld/point.
Fairweather, G. W.; Sanders, D. H. y Tornatzky, L. G. (1974): Creating change in mental health organization, New York: Pergamon Press.
Fairweather, G. W. y Davidson, W. S. (1986): Community experimentation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Farmer, S. M.; Tierney, P. y Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003): “Employee creativity in Taiwan: an application of role identity theory”, Academic. Management. J., 46: 618-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30040653
Hargadon, A. B. y Bechky, B. A. (2006): “When collections of creative become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work”, Organ. Sci., 17: 484-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
Hazel, K. L. y Onaga, E. (2003): “Experimental social innovation and dissemination: The promise and its delivery”, American Journal of Community Psychology, v. 32, n.os 3/4: 286-294.
Hennessey, B. A. y Amabile, T. (2010): “Creativity”, Annual. Review. Psychol., 61: 569-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 PMid:19575609
Holligsworth, J. R. (2000): “Doing Institutional analysis. Implications for the study of innovations”, Review of Int. Pol. Econ., 7, 4: 595-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/096922900750034563
Kaschdan, T. B. y Fincham, F. D. (2002): “Facilitating creativity by regulating curiosity. Comment”, American Psychologist., 57: 373-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.5.373 PMid:12025769
Kaufman, G. (2002): “Creativity and confidence: price of achievement? Comment”, American Psychologist., 57: 375-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.5.375 PMid:12025771
Kaufman, G. (2003): “What to messure? A new look at the concept of creativity”, Sandinavian Journal of Education Research, 47: 235-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830308604
Kaufman, J. C.; Lee, J. y Lee, S. (2007): “Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: new evidence of reliability”, Thinking Skills Creativity, 2: 96-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2007.04.002
Khan, A. W. (2003): “Towards Knowledge Societies. An Interview”, World of Science, vol. 1, n. 4.
Kirton, M. (1994): Adaptors and Innovators. Styles creativity and problem solving, London: Routledge.
Lash, S. (2002): Critique of Information, New York: Sage.
Lee, S. (2008): “Commentary: reliability and validity of uniqueness scoring in creativity assesment”, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts, 2: 103-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.103
Mannix, E. y Neale, M. (2005): “What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations”, Psychol. Public. Int., 6: 31-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
Moscovici, S. (1979): La Psychologie des minorités actives, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Mugny, G. (1981): El poder de las minorías. Psicología social de la influencia de las minorías e ilustración experimental, Barcelona: Ed. ROL.
Mattelart, A. (2001): Histoire de la Société de l’Information, Paris: Ed. La Decouverte. Mumford, M. D. y Antes, A. L. (2007): “Debates about the ‘general’ picture: cognition and creative achievement”, Creativity Research Journal, 19: 367- 374.
Paulaus, P. B. y Yang, H. C. (2000): “Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations”, Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 82: 76- 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
Plucker, J. A. y Runco, M. A. (1998): “The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: current issues, recent advances and future directions in creativity assessment”, Roeper Rev., 21: 36-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553924
Romo, M. (2007): “Psicología de la ciencia y de la creatividad”, Revista Creatividad y Sociedad, n. 10: 7-31. www.creatividadysociedad.com.
Silvia, P. L. (2008): “Creativity and intelligence revised: a latent variable analysis on Wallach and Kogan, 1965”, Creat. Res. J., 20: 34-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400410701841807
Svenson, N.; Norlander, T. y Archer, T. (2002): “Effects of individual performance versus group performance with and without de Bono techniques for enhance creativity”, Korean Journal Problem-Solving, 10: 4959.
Torrance, E. P. (1966/1974): Torrance, test of creativity thinking norms - Technical manual, Lexington, MA: Ginn.
Treffinger, D. J.; Isaken, S. G. y Dorval, K. B. (2006): Creative Problem Solving: an introduction, Waco, TX: Prufrock.
Vosburg, S. K. (1998): “Mood and the quantity and quality of ideas”, Creativity Research Journal, 11: 15-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1104_5
Weshler, S. (2006): “Validity of the Torrance test of creativity thinking to the Brazilian culture”, Creativity ResearchJournal, 18: 15-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
