The knowledge transfer from the Humanities: possibilities and characteristics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2008.i732.211Keywords:
knowledge transfer, Humanities, Public ResearchAbstract
This article analyzes the specific features that characterise knowledge transfer from Social Sciences and Humanities research groups to their socioeconomic environment. First, it shows that knowledge transfer is a complex and evolving concept. Second, to capture this complexity we identify the factors that affect knowledge transfer following Bozeman’s model (2000). We then apply the model to the empirical data obtained from interviews with heads of research groups in the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. The results show that the characteristics of the transfer process (in terms of the type of agents involved, the content of the transfer, dissemination mechanisms, receivers and the contextual factors, barriers to transfer) are very different in the social sciences and humanities from those prevalent in the experimental sciences and engineering. Consequently the policies to support efficient knowledge transfer must also be different and tailored to the specific characteristics of knowledge and production and use in the social sciences and humanities.
Downloads
References
Amara, N.; Ouimet, M. y Landry, R. (2004): “New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies”. Science Communication, 26, 75-106. doi:10.1177/1075547004267491
Beyer, J. M. y Trice, H. M. (1982): “The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings”. Administrative Science Quartely, 27, 591-622. doi:10.2307/2392533
Bozeman, B.; Papadakis, M. y Coker, K. (1995): Industry perspectives on commercial interactions with federal laboratories: does the cooperative technology paradigm really work?, Report to the National Science Foundation. Research on Science and Technology Program, January.
Bozeman, B. (2000): “Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory”. Research Policy, 29 (4-5), 627-655. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
Bush, V. (1945): “Science, the Endless Frontier. A Report to the President”, Traducción en Revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia (En REDES 14) (1999): Ciencia, la frontera sin fin, pág. 89-136, Buenos Aires.
Carayol, N. (2003): “Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle”, Research Policy, 32(6), 887-908. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00108-7
Castro-Martínez, E.; Fernández de Lucio, I.; Gutiérrez-Gracia, A. y Añón, M. J. (2001): “La estrategia de dinamización en la cooperación investigación-empresa: desarrollo conceptual y aplicaciones”. Libro de actas del IX Seminario Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica (ALTEC), San José (Costa Rica).
Cloutier, J. (2003): Qu’est-ce que l’innovation sociale?, Collection Études Théoriques, n.º ET0314. Centre de Recherche sur les innovations sociales (CRISES).
CSIC (2006): Plan de actuación 2006-2009. CSIC. Madrid.
CST (2000): Innovation Sociale et innovation technologique. L’apport de la recherche en sciences sociales et humaines. Les Publications du Quebec. Conseil de la Science et de la Technologie. Quebec, Canadá.
David, P. A. y Foray, D. (2002): “Una introducción a la economía y a la sociedad del saber”. International Social Science Journal, n.º 171, 7-28.
Devine, M. D.; James Jr. T. E. y Adams, T. I. (1987): “Government supported industry-university research centers: Issues for successful technology transfer”. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 12(1), 27-37. doi:10.1007/BF02371360
Djellal, F. y Gallouj, F. (2005): “Mapping innovation dynamics in hospitals”. Research Policy, 34, 817-835. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.04.007
Dosi, G. (1982): “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technological change”, Research Policy, 11 (3), 147-162. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
Etzkowitz, H. (1994): “Technology-Transfer and the University”, Minerva, 32(2), 232-237.
Etkowitz, H. y Leydersdorff, L. (2000): “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple elix of university-industry-government relations”, Research Policy, 29, 109-123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Ferlie, E. y Wood, M. (2003): “Novel Modes of Knowledge Production? Producers and Consumers in Health Services Research”, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 8(4 supplement), 51-57. doi:10.1258/135581903322405171 PMid:14596748
Fernández, I.; Castro, E.; Conesa, F. y Gutiérrez, A. (2000): “Las relaciones Universidad- empresa: entre la transferencia de resultados y el aprendizaje regional”, Revista Espacios, 21(2), 1-17.
Freeman, C. (1987): Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Lesson from Japan, Pinter, London.
Frodeman, R.; Thompson Klein, J.; Mitcham, C. y Tuana, N. (2007): “Interdisciplinary studies in science, technology and society: New directions: Science, Humanities, Policy”, Technology in Society, 29, 145-152. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.01.002
Gallaher, M. P. y Petrusa, J. E. (2006): “Innovation in the U.S. service sector”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 611-628. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-0018-4
Geiger, R. L. y Sa, C. (2005): “Beyond technology transfer: U.S. state policies to harness university research for economic development”, Minerva, 43(1), 1-21. doi:10.1007/s11024-004-6623-1
Gilbert, M. y Cordeyhayes, M. (1996): “Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation”, Technovation, 16(6), 301-312. doi:10.1016/0166-4972(96)00012-0
Godin, B. y Doré, C. (2005): “Measuring the impacts of science on society: Beyond the economic dimension”. INRS-UCS. Montreal.
Harmon, B.; Ardishvili, A.; Cardozo, R.; Elder, T.; Leuthold, J.; Parshall, J.; Raghian, M. y Smith, M. (1997): “Mapping the university technology transfer process”, Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6), 423-434. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00064-X
Heidegger, M. (1994): “La pregunta por la técnica,” en Conferencias y artículos. Ediciones del Serbal, Barcelona, pp. 9-37.
Ibarra, A.; Barrenechea, J. y Castro, J. (2006): “Indicadores para evaluar las actividades de investigación en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades en la UPV/EHU. Hacia la construcción de un índice de actividad científica”, Documento de trabajo n.º 4, enero 2006. Cátedra Sánchez-Mazas UPV/EHU. Universidad del País Vasco: España.
INEa (2007): Cuentas económicas de España en 2005, http://www.ine.es.
INEb (2007): Estadísticas sobre actividades en investigación científica y desarrollo tecnológico (I+D) en 2005, http://www.ine.es.
Jacobson, N.; Butterill, D. y Goering, P. (2004): “Organizational factors that influence University-Based Researchers’ Engagement in Knowledge Transfer activities”, Science Communication, 25 (3), pp. 246-259. doi:10.1177/1075547003262038
Kline, S. J. y Rosenberg, N. (1986): An overview of Innovation, en R. Landau y N. Rosenberg (eds.) “The positive Sum Strategy. Harnessing Technology for economic growth”, The National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Knott, J. y Wildavsky, A. (1980): “If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem?”, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, 537-578.
Landry, R.; Amara, N. y Lamari, M. (2001): “Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada”, Research Policy, 30(2), 333-349. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0
Landry, R.; Lamari, M. y Amara, N. (2003): “The Extent and Determinants of Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies”, Public Administration Review, 63(2), 193-205. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00279
Lavis, J. N.; Robertson, D.; Woodside, J. M.; Mcleod, C. B. y Abelson, J. (2003): “How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?”, Milbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221-248. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052 PMid:12841049
Lemmonier, P. (1986): “The Study of Material Culture Today: Toward an Anthropology of Technical Systems”, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5, 147-186. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7
Lomas, J. (2000): “Using ‘Linkage And Exchange’ To Move Research Into Policy At A Canadian Foundation”, Health Affairs, 19(3), 236-240. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.236 PMid:10812803
Miles, I. (2000): “Services Innovation: coming of Age in the Knowledge-Based Economy”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 371-389. doi:10.1016/S1363-9196(00)00020-2
Moed, H. F.; Luwei, M. y Nederhof, A. J. (2002): “Towards research performance in the humanities”, Library Trends, 50(3), 498-520.
Molas-Gallart, J. (1997): “Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of ‘dual-use’ technology transfer”, Research Policy, 26(3), 367-385. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00023-1
Molas Gallart, J.; Tang, P. y Morrow, S. (2000): “Assessing the non-academic impact of grant-funded socio-economic research: results from a pilot study”, Research Evaluation, 9(3), 171-182. doi:10.3152/147154400781777269
Molas-Gallart, J.; Salter, A.; Patel, P.; Scott, A. y Duran, X. (2002): Measuring Third Stream Activities. Final Report to the Russell Group of Universities. Science and Technology Policy Research (SPRU), University of Sussex. Birmingham.
Moncada-Paterno-Castello, P.; Rojo, J.; Bellido, F.; Fiore, F. y Tübke, A. (2003): “Early identification and marketing of innovative technologies: a case study of RTD result valorisation at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre”, Technovation, 23 (2003) 655-667. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00022-6
Mowery, D. y Rosenberg, N. (1979): The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies, en Rosenberg, N. (ed.) “Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics”, Cambridge University Press, pp. 193-244.
Nederhof, A. J. (2006): “Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities”, Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100.
Nelson, R. (ed.) (1993): National Innovation Systems, Oxford University Press, London.
Nonaka, I. y Takeuchi, H. (1995): “The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation”, Oxford University Press. New York.
Nutley, S.; Walter, I. y Davies, H. (2003): “From Knowing to Doing”; Evaluation, 9(2), 125-148. doi:10.1177/1356389003009002002
OCDE (1996): The Knowledge-based Economy. Ref. N.º OCDE/GD (96)102.
OCDE. Paris. OCDE-European Communities (2005): Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Third edition. OCDE. Paris.
Pasquali, A. (1979): Comprender la Comunicación, ed. Arte. Caracas.
Polt, W.; Rammer, C.; Scharting, D.; Gassler, H. y Schibany, A. (2001): “Benchmarking Industry-Science Relations: the Role of Framework Conditions”, Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 247-258. doi:10.3152/147154301781781453
Red de OTRI de las universidades españolas (2007): La Encuesta de la Red de OTRI de las Universidades españolas en 2006. Madrid. http://www.redotriuniversidades.net
Roessner, J. D. (2000): “Technology transfer”, en Hill, C. (Ed.). Science and technology policy in the US. A time of change. Longman, London.
Siegel, D. S.; Waldman, D. A.; Atwater, L. E. y Link, A. N. (2004): “Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
Schmookler, J. (1966): Invention and economic growth, Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Weiss, Carol H. (1979): “The Many Meanings of Research Utilization,” Public Administration Review, 39(5): 426-431. doi:10.2307/3109916
Yih-Tong, P. y Scott, J. L. (2005): “An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer”, Journal of knowledge management, 9(2), 75-90. doi:10.1108/13673270510590236
Zhao, L. M. y Reisman, A. (1992): “Toward meta research on technology-transfer”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering, 39(1), 13-21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
