¿Nuevos patrones de investigación? Dinámicas de apertura y cierre en el proceso de integración socio-técnica

Andoni Eizagirre

doi:10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4002

Autores/as

Andoni Eizagirre Universidad de Mondragón https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-6108

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4002

Palabras clave:

Política de I D, competitividad, integración socio-técnica, investigación e innovación responsable, Unión Europea

Resumen

La formulación de las políticas de investigación y desarrollo está siendo transformada de manera novedosa en los documentos más recientes que se elaboran en Europa. Una de las peculiaridades es que los patrones de investigación transitan hacia prácticas científico-tecnológicas más interactivas entre los distintos actores de la sociedad. Así, como respuesta a la naturaleza compleja de la investigación las primeras medidas se revelan en aquellas estrategias para la promoción de actitudes emprendedoras y colaborativas entre los actores académico-empresariales de la investigación y el desarrollo. A estas iniciativas se superponen otros planteamientos que trascienden el objetivo primariamente economicista de la colaboración e integran los aspectos sociales y éticos en la investigación y el desarrollo. Sin embargo, estas transformaciones también están sujetas a diversas tensiones de base y a objetivos concurrentes. El artículo dilucida estas dinámicas de apertura-y-cierre y manifiesta que algunas de las relaciones y demandas se muestran más resistentes al cambio.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adam, B. y Groves, G. (2011). Futures tended: Care and future-oriented responsibility. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 31 (1), pp. 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610391237

Barinaga, M. (2000). Asilomar Revisited: Lessons for Today? Science, 287 (5458), pp. 1584-1585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5458.1584 PMid:10766605

Berman, E. P. (2012). Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840472

Braun, K., Herrmann, S. L., Konninger, S. and Moore, A. (2010). Ethical Reflection Must Always Be Measured. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35 (6), pp. 839-864. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909357917

Commission of the European Communities (2001). European Governance: A White Paper. [En línea]. Disponible en https:// ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/communication-white-paper-governance-com2001428-20010725_en.pdf

Commission of the European Communities (2003). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Some Key Issues in Europe's Competitiveness - Towards an Integrated Approach. [En línea]. Disponible en https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/ regdoc/rep/1/2003/EN/1-2003-704- EN-F1-1.Pdf

Douglas, H. E. (2003). The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility). American Philosophical Quarterly, 40 (1), pp. 59-68.

Eizagirre, A., Rodríguez, H. e Ibarra, A. (2017). Politicizing Responsible Innovation: Responsibility as Inclusive Governance. International Journal of Innova tion Studies, 1 (1), pp. 20-36. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1440.101003

Elzinga, A. (2012). Features of the Current Science Policy Regime: Viewed in Historical Perspective. Science and Public Policy, 39 (4), pp. 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs046

European Commission (2002). Science and Society. Action Plan. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [En línea]. Disponible en https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/ pdf/pub_gender_equality/ss_ap_en.pdf

European Commission (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Commission (2008). Challenging Europe's Research: Rationales for the European Research Area (ERA). Report of the ERA Expert Group. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission. Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. [En línea]. Disponible en https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/ COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20 %20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20 -%20EN%20version.pdf

European Commission (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. [En línea]. Disponible en https:// ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/ pdf/proposals/communication_from_ the_commission_-_horizon_2020_-_ the_framework_programme_for_research_and_innovation.pdf

European Commission (2012). Ethical and Regulatory Challenges to Science and Research Policy at the Global Level. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [En línea]. Disponible en http://ec.europa. eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/ethical-and-regulatory-challenges-042012_en.pdf

European Commission (2013). Options for Strengthening. Responsible Research and Innovation Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [En línea]. Disponible en https://ec.europa. eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf

European Commission (2014). Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe's Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges. Publications Office of the European Union. [En línea]. Disponible en https:// ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_ rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf

European Commission (2018). Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [En línea]. Disponible en https://publications. europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/ publication/2c5a0fb6-c070-11e8- 9893-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

Flink, T. y Kaldewey, D. (2018). The New Production of Legitimacy: STI Policy Discourses Beyond the Contract Metaphor. Research Policy, 47 (1), pp. 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.008

Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding 'Anticipatory Governance'. Social Studies of Science, 44 (2), pp. 218-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669 PMid:24941612

Hilgartner, S., Prainsack, B. y Hurlbut, J-B. (2016). Ethics as Governance in Genomics and Beyond. En: Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C. A. y Smith-Doerr, L. (eds). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 823-851.

Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy Analysis, Science and Politics: From 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together'. Science and Public Policy, 26 (3), pp. 201-210. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782482

Hullmann, A. (2008). European Activities in the Field of Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects (ELSA) and Governance of Nanotechnology. European Commission, DG Research, Unit "Nano and Converging Sciences and Technologies". [En línea]. Disponible en https://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/reports/ reportpdf/report122.pdf

Irwin, A. y Wynne, B. (eds.) (1995). Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jamison, A. (2012). Science and Technology in Postwar Europe. En: Stone, D. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 630- 648. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560981.013.0032

Jasanoff, S. (2012). Science and Public Reason. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203113820

Jasanoff, S. (2016). The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. New York: Norton.

Kaldewey, D. y Schauz, D. (eds.). (2018). Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8bt0z7

Kleinman, D-L. (1995). Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham: Duke University Press.

Krismky, S. (2005). From Asilomar to Industrial Biotechnology: Risks, Reductionism and Regulation. Science as Culture, 14 (4), pp. 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430500368998 PMid:16619467

Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. y Wynne, B. (1996). Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage.

Leach, M., Scoones, I. y Wynne, B. (eds.) (2005). Science and Citizens. Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books.

Levidow, L. (2009). Democratizing agri-biotechnology? European public participation in agbiotech assessment. Comparative Sociology, 8 (4), pp. 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913309X461633

Levidow, L. y Neubauer, C. (2014). EU Research Agendas: Embedding What Future? Science as Culture, 23 (3), pp. 397- 412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.926149

López Cerezo, J. A. y Luján, J. L. (2000). Ciencia y política del riesgo. Madrid: Alianza.

Marklund, G., Vonortas, N. y Wessner, Ch. (eds.). (2009). The Innovation Imperative: National Innovation Strategies in the Global Economy. Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848446090

Merton, R. (1942). A Note on Science and Democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, pp. 115-126.

Nelson, R. R. y Wright, G. (1992). The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (4), pp. 1931-1964.

Oudheusden, M. van (2014). Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1 (1), pp. 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882097

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. y Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39 (6), pp. 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093

Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghtell, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E. y Guston, D. (2013). A Framework for Responsible Innovation. En: Owen, R., Bessant, J. y Heintz, M. (eds.). Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch2

Polanyi, M. (1951). The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Reijers, W., Wright, D., Brey, P., Weber, K., Rodrigues, R., O'Sullivan, D. y Gordijn, B. (2017). Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24 (5), pp. 1437-1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8 PMid:28900898

Rhodes, R. (2012). The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Ribeiro, B. E., Smith, R. D. J. y Millar, K. (2017). A mobilising concept? Unpacking academic representations of responsible research and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23 (1), pp. 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6 PMid:26956121

Rip, A. (2014). The Past and Future of RRI. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 1 (10), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0017-4 PMid:26573982 PMCid:PMC4513037

Rip, A. (2016). The Clothes of the Emperor: An Essay on RRI in and around Brussels. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3 (3), pp. 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1255701

Saille, S. de (2015). Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of 'Responsible Research and Innovation'. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2 (2), pp. 152- 168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280

Sarewitz, D. (1996). Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology and the Politics of Progress. Philadelphia: Temple of University Press.

Sarewitz, D. (2016). Saving Science. The New Atlantis, 49, pp. 4-40.

Schomberg, R. von (2007). From the Ethics of Technology Towards an Ethics of Knowledge Policy & Knowledge Assessment. A working document from the European Commission Services. [En línea]. Disponible en https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/aa44eb61-5be2- 43d6-b528-07688fb5bd5a

Schomberg, R. von (2013). A Vision on Responsible Research and Innovation. En: Owen, R., Bessant, J. y Heintz, M. (eds.). Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3

Shapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226750170.001.0001

Singh, J. (2008). The UK Nanojury as 'upstream' public engagement. Participatory Learning and Action, 58 (1), pp. 27-32.

Steelman, J. R. (1948). Science and Public Policy: A Report by the President's Scientific Research Board. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 4 (1), pp. 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1948.11460154

Stilgoe, J. y Guston, D. (2017). Responsible Research and Innovation. En: Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C. A. y Smith-Doerr, L. (eds). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 853-880.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. y Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42 (9), pp. 1568-1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Timmermans, J. (2017). Mapping the RRI Landscape: An Overview of Organisations, Projects, Persons, Areas and Topics. En: Asveld, L., Dam-Mieras, R. van, Swierstra, T., Lavrijssen, S., Linse, K. y Hoven, J. van den (eds.). Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda? Cham: Springer, pp. 21-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_3

Wynne, B. (1982). Institutional Mythologies and Dual Societies in the Management of Risk. En: Kunreuther, H. C. y Ley, E. V. (eds.). The Risk Analysis Controversy: An Institutional Perspective. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81940-7_10

Zwart, H., Landeweerd, L. y Rooij, A. van (2014). Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from 'ELSA' to 'RRI'. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 10 (11), pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x PMid:26085447 PMCid:PMC4648839

Zwart, H. y Nelis, A. (2009). What is ELSA genomics? EMBO Reports, 10 (6), pp. 540-544. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.115 PMid:19488040 PMCid:PMC2711829

Otros recursos

A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation. [En línea]. Disponible en https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf

Creating an Innovative Europe. Report of the Independent Expert Group on R&D and Innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit and chaired by Mr Esko Aho. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006.

Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 march 2000. Presidency Conclusions. [En línea]. Disponible en https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm