Arbor, Vol 194, No 787 (2018)

¿Hubo un 68 científico? Su repercusión en action research y mixing methods


https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.787n1009

José Andrés-Gallego
Instituto de Historia, CSIC, España
orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-2741

Resumen


El autor se plantea si hubo un “68 científico” y se centra en dos aspectos que corresponden a dos propuestas metodológicas definidas en los años cuarenta y cincuenta del siglo XX con las expresiones “action research” y “mixing methods”, aplicadas especialmente en las ciencias sociales. En la primera, el clima creado en torno a los sucesos de 1968 contribuyó a acentuar el sentido participativo que tenía, por definición, la “action research”; es decir: la importancia de que las personas investigadas participen en la elaboración, ejecución y aplicación de esa misma investigación que se hace sobre ellas. Se apelaba ante todo al fondo democrático y antiautoritario que latía en esa propuesta y que se había convertido en parte del clima general dominante en aquellos días. La repercusión del propio 68 en “mixing methods” se centró, por su parte, en el estudio de lo ocurrido (el estudio del 68 por tanto), sobre todo desde el punto de vista sociológico y desde el de la psicología social planteada sobre la base de “mixing methods”. El autor se detiene en la propuesta de Norman Denzin; pero, tanto en el caso del “mixing methods” como en el de la “action research”, se remonta a sus respectivos orígenes inmediatos y, por tanto, a las propuestas que partieron principalmente de Kurt Lewin y la escuela de Chicago.

Palabras clave


Mixed methods; action research; mayo del 68; Kurt Lewin; Norman Denzin

Texto completo:


HTML PDF XML

Referencias


Ali, T. and Watkins, S. (1998). 1968: Marching in the streets. New York: The Free Press.

Back, K. W. (1992). This Business of Topology. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), pp. 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00883.x

Bargal, D., Gold, M. and Lewin, M. (1992). Introduction: The Heritage of Kurt Lewin. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), pp. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00879.x

Barker, J. (2015). Missed encounter Althusser-Mao-Spinoza. Angelaki-Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 20 (4), pp. 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1096632

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. PMCid:PMC250024

Brannick, T. and Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being "native": The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10 (1), pp. 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289253

Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. PMCid:PMC3455230

Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 (2), pp. 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016

Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: R. McNally.

Collier, J. (1945). United States Indian administration as a laboratory of ethnic relations. Social Research, 12 (3), pp. 265-303.

Coplin, W. D. and Kegley, Ch. W. (eds.) (1971). A Multi-method introduction to international politics: Observation, Explanation, and Prescription. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company. PMid:4111063 PMCid:PMC1529822

Denzin, N. K. (1970/1989). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Denzin, N. K. (comp.). (1970a). Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.

Denzin, N. K. (1970b). The Values of Social Science. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.

Denzin, N. K. (1971). The Logic of Naturalistic Inquiry. Social Forces, 50 (2), pp. 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/50.2.166

Denzin, N. K. (1992). Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies: The Politics of Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. PMCid:PMC49163

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6 (2), pp. 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. and Smith, L. T. (eds.). (2008) Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage. PMid:19019088

Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. London: Penguin.

Eikeland, O. (2007). From epistemology to gnoseology – Understanding the knowledge claimed of action research. Management Research News, 30 (5), pp. 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710746346

Eikeland, O. and Nicolini, D. (2011). Turning practically: Broadening the horizon. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24 (2), pp. 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111119744

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, pp. 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777

Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd. Available in http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Fisher/Methods PMid:17246289

Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. London: Oliver and Boyd.

Fradkin, E. (2011). General Field Theory. Urbana Champaign: University of Illinois. https://archive.org/details/flooved2870 PMCid:PMC3120200

Fraser, R. (1988). 1968, a student generation in revolt. New York: Pantheon.

Gold, M. (1992). Metatheory and Field Theory in Social Psychology: Relevance or Elegance? Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), pp. 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00884.x

Goldman, L. (2012). Dewey's Pragmatism from an Anthropological Point of View. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 48 (1), pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.48.1.1

Heisenberg, W. (1925). Quantum-Theoretical Re-Interpretation of Kinematic and Mechanical Relations. Zeitschrift für Physik, 33, pp. 879-893. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01328377

Hopf, E. (1931). On causality, statistics and probability. Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 13 (1-4), pp. 51-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/sapm193413151

Karlsen, J. I. (1991). Action Research as Method: Reflecting from a Program for Developing Methods and Competence. In: Whyte, W. F. (ed.). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 143-58. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985383.n10

Lee, A. M. (1986). Depression, War, SPSSI, and SSSP. Journal of Social Issues, 42 (4), pp. 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00871.x

Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/10019-000

Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2 (4), pp. 34-46. (Reed. in Lewin, G. W. (ed.) (1973). Resolving Social Conflicts. London: Souvenir Press).

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method, and Reality in Social Science: Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, 1 (1), pp. 5-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103

Louçã, F. (2008). Should The Widest Cleft in Statistics - How and Why Fisher opposed Neyman and Pearson. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão.

Maccoby, E. E. (1992). Trends in the Study of Socialization: Is There a Lewinian Heritage? Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), pp. 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00892.x

Maruyama, G. (1992). Lewin's Impact on Education: Instilling Cooperation and Conflict Management Skills in School Children. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), pp. 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00890.x

McCall, W. A. (1922). How to measure in education. New York: Macmillan.

McCall, W. A. (1923). How to Experiment in Education. New York: Macmillan. PMid:16993632 PMCid:PMC1405525

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mead, G. H. (1938). The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Michael-Matsas, S. (2016). A Utopia of immanence: Revolution in Deleuze and Guattari. Deleuze studies, 10 (3), pp. 289-300. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2016.0227

Miller, J. (1994). Democracy in the streets: From Port Huron to the siege of Chicago. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Newman, I. and Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois Press.

Oakley, A. (1998). Experimentation and Social Interventions: A Forgotten but Important History. British Medical Journal, 317 (7167), pp. 1239-1242. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1239

Pedersen, E. L. (2007). Theory is everywhere: A discourse on theory. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 25 (1), pp. 106-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X06296872

Porter, D. (2016). French anarchists and the continuing power of May 1968. Modern & Contemporary France, 24 (2), pp. 143- 159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2016.1153461

Rapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research with special reference to the Tavistock experience. Human Relations, 23 (6), pp. 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677002300601

Robcis, C. (2014). May '68 and the ethical turn of French thought. Moderns Intellectual History, 11 (1), pp. 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244313000437

Rosenwein, R. E. and Campbell, D. T. (1992). Mobilization to achieve collective action and democratic majority/plurality amplification. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), pp. 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00888.x

Ross, K. (2002). May'68 and its Afterlifes. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226728001.001.0001

Roy, S. N. and Gnanadesikan, R. (1959). Some contributions to Anova in one or more dimensions. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30 (2), pp. 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706254

Rutherford, E. and Geiger, H. (1910). The probability variations in the distribution of particles: with a Note by H. Bateman. Philosophical Magazine, 20 (118), pp. 698-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786441008636955

Sakamoto, H. (1965). Statistical-Theory of Systematic-Sampling and Mixing Methods of Bulk Materials. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 41 (2), pp. 883-884.

Schrödinger, E. (1926). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. Annalen der Physik, 384, pp. 361-376, 489-527. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19263840602

Seife, Ch. (2005). Do Deeper Principles Underlie Quantum Uncertainty and Nonlality? Science, 309 (5731), p. 98. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.309.5731.98 PMid:15994544

Shadish, W. R., Cook, Th. D. and Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. PMid:11928889

Shewhart, W. A. (1924). Some applications of statistical methods to the analysis of physical and engineering idea. Bell System Technical Journal, 3 (1), pp. 43-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1924.tb01347.x

Smith, M. B. (1986). Kurt Lewin Memorial Address, 1986: War, Peace, and Psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 42 (4), pp. 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00867.x

Soloski, J. and Daley, P. (1978). Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology: A perspective of qualitative research. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 4 (1), pp. 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/019685997800400103

Teddlie, C. and Johnson, R. B. (2009). Methodological thought since the 20th century. In: C. Teddlie and A. Tashakkori (eds.). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 62-82.

Thorndike, E. L. (1913): Educational Diagnosis. Science, 37 (943), pp. 133- 142. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.37.943.133 PMid:17794518

Thorndike, E. L., McCall, A. and Chapman, J. C. (1916). Ventilation in relation to mental work. New York: Teachers College (Columbia University). PMid:28909707 PMCid:PMC5144596

Villena, L. A. (1975). La revolución cultural (Desafío de una juventud). Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.

White, R. K. (1992). A Personal Assessment of Lewin's Major Contributions. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), pp. 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00882.x

Yeasmin, S. and Rahhman, K. F. (2012). 'Triangulation' research method as the tool of social science research. BUP Journal, 1 (1), pp. 154-163.




Copyright (c) 2018 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Licencia de Creative Commons
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.


Contacte con la revista arbor@csic.es

Soporte técnico soporte.tecnico.revistas@csic.es