La evaluación de la escritura creativa en el contexto universitario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2020.798n4003Palabras clave:
Escritura creativa, evaluación, rúbricas, enseñanza universitariaResumen
Existe una larga tradición sobre las rúbricas pedagógicas de la escritura, principalmente referida a los niveles educativos no universitarios y con aplicación a la competencia lingüística en la lengua nativa o en una segunda lengua. En este trabajo se revisan los resultados de investigación referidos a la evaluación de la escritura creativa en niveles preuniversitarios y universitarios en contextos generales (no particularizados en zonas o culturas, sobre todo teniendo en cuenta la inexistencia de este tipo de bibliografía en lengua española), en cuanto corresponden al desarrollo de competencias en la lengua nativa, más allá de su empleo en el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico o en determinados ámbitos pedagógicos, y se ofrece una aproximación a los estándares de valoración del progreso de los estudiantes en esta disciplina.
Descargas
Citas
Allardice, Kevin (2018). The Oaks. Mercy High School. Burlingame. Spring 2018. Disponible en: https://issuu.com/mercyhsb/docs/the_oaks_-_spring_2018 [Fecha de consulta: 23 noviembre 2019].
Allen, Mary J. (2014). Using Rubrics to Grade, Assess, and Improve Student Learning. Miami-Dade College March 7, 2014. Disponible en: https://www.academia.edu/39389988/Using_Rubrics_to_Grade_ Assess_and_Improve_Student_Learning [Fecha de consulta: 24 octubre 2019].
Arter, Judy y McTighe, Jay (2000). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Oaks CA: Corwin Press.
Ashton, Scott y Davies, Randall S. (2015). Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education, 36 (3): 312-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733
Baer, John y McKool, Sharon S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. En: Christopher S. Schreiner (ed.). Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education. Rider University: IGI Global, pp. 65-77. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004
Blamires, Mike y Patterson, Andrew (2014). Can Creativity be Assessed? Towards an Evidence. Informed Framework for Assessing and Planning Progress in Creativity. Cambridge Journal of Educa tion, 44 (2): 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.860081
Blomer, Yvonne Elizabeth (2011). Assessment in creative writing. Wascana Review, 43 (1): 61-73.
Brookhart, Susan M. (2013). How to Create and use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. Alexandria: ASCD.
Burke, Robert A. (2003). The Influence of Rubrics on High School Students' Creative Writing Skills. [Tesis de máster]. Defiance College: Ohio.
Burroway, Janet (2011). Imaginative Writing: Elements of Craft. New York: Penguin.
Carmines, Edward G. y Zeller, Richard A. (eds.) (2005). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Carruthers, Lindsey y MacLean, Roy (2019). The dynamic definition of creativity: Implications for creativity assessment. En Ronald A. Beghetto y Giovanni E. Corazza (eds.). Dynamic perspectives on creativity. New directions for theory, research, and practice in education. Springer, pp. 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_12
Davenport, Aneesa (2017). Assessing Creative Writing Is Hard, So Here Are Three Ways to Avoid. Putting It into Words: The Future of Writing Instruction. Oct 2, 2017. Disponible en https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-10-02-assessing-creative-writing-is-hard-so-here-are-three-ways-to-avoid-it [Fecha de consulta: 23 noviembre 2019]
Dawson, Philip (2017). Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
Díaz Suárez, Saray (2015). Evaluating creative writing: the criterion behind short stories' assessment. [Tesis de máter] Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona: Barcelona. Disponible en https://ddd.uab.cat/record/137423
Dornisch, Michele M. y Sabatini McLoughlin, Andrea (2006). Limitations of web-based rubric resources: Addressing the challenges. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11 (3): 1-8.
Gotesky, Rubin y Breithaupt, Erwin. (1978). Creativity: A Metasociological Analysis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107028
Graham, Steve; Hebert, Michael y Harris, Karen R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal 115 (4): 523- 547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
Griffin, Patrick y Anh, Phan Nguyet (2005). Assessment of creative writing in Vietnamese primary education. Asia Pacific Education Review 6 (1), pp. 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024969
Harper, Graeme (2016). Teaching Creative Writing. En Rodney H. Jones (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity. New York: Routledge, pp. 498-512.
Holland, Siobman; Butt, Maggie; Harper, Graeme y Wandor, Michele (2003). Creative writing: A good practice guide. English Subject Centre. Report Series, 6. Disponible en http:// english.heacademy.ac.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2015/10/cwguide.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 23 noviembre 2019].
Huerta, Margarita; Lara-Aleci, Rafael; Tong, Fuhui e Irby, Beverly J. (2014). Developing and Validating a Science Notebook Rubric for Fifth-Grade Non-Mainstream Students. International Journal of Science Education 36 (11): 1849-1870. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879623
Joseph, Sue A.; Rickett, Carolyn.; Northcote, Maria. y Christian, Beverly. J. (2020). 'Who are you to judge my writing?': Student collaboration in the co-construction of assessment rubrics. New Writing, 17 (1): 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2019.1566368
Kaufman, James C. y Baer, John (2012). Beyond new and appropriate. Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal 24 (1): 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649237
Kaufman, James. C.; Baer, John. y Cole, Jason. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43 (4): 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x
Kozbelt, Aaron; Beghetto, Ronald. A. y Runco, Mark A. (2010). Theories of creativity. En James C. Kaufman y Robert J. Sternberg (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004
Kroll, Jeri (1997). A or C: Can we assess creative work fairly? Disponible en https:// dspace2.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/handle/2328/15073 [Fecha de consulta: 4 septiembre 2019].
Luft, Julie (1997). Design your own rubric. Science Scope, 20: 25-27.
MacKinnon, Maria Moira (2001) Using observational feedback to promote academic development, The International Journal for Academic Development, 6: 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110033689
Miller, Michael D.; Linn, Robert L. y Gronlund, Norman E. (2013). Measurement and assessment in teaching. New Jersey: Pearson.
Mills, Paul (2006). The Routledge Creative Writing Course Book. New York: Routledge.
Morris, Gerard y Sharplin, Elaine (2013). The Assessment of Creative Writing. English in Education 47 (1): 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12004
Moskal, Barbara. M. y Leydens, Jon A. (2000). Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7 (10): 71-81.
Mozaffari, Hamideh (2013). An Analytical Rubric for Assessing Creativity in Creative Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3 (12): 2214-2219. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2214-2219
Newman, Jenny (2007). The Evaluation of Creative Writing at M.A. Level (UK). En Steven Earnshaw (ed.). The Handbook of Teaching Creative Writing. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, pp. 24-36.
Nezakatgoo, Behzad (2011) Portfolio as a viable alternative in writing assessment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2 (4): 747-756. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.4.747-756
Perry, Tonya (2004). The Art of Grading Papers Quickly and Effectively. English Journal, 94 (1): 115-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/4128859
Peters, Cheryl (1990). Applause, applause: Evaluating creative response and projects. Annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Atlanta, GA, November 16-21, 1990.
Price, Kevin (2019) The writing teacher: rethinking assessment and transformative learning in the creative writing classroom. New Writing. The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 17 (4): 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2019.1699577
Rababah, Luqman. (2018). An adapted version of Torrance test of creative thinking (TTCT) in EFL/ESL writing: a rubric scoring and a review of studies. International Journal of English and Education, 7 (2): 128-136.
Rensahw, Jason (2010). How do we grade creative writing? Learning Twigs. Disponible en https://jasonrenshaw.typepad.com/jason_renshaws_web_log/2010/04/how-do-we-grade-creative-writing.html [Fecha de consulta 24 octubre 2019].
Rezaei, Ali Reza y Lovorn, Michael (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing writing, 15 (1): 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
Rochford, Linda y Borchert, Patricia S. (2011). Assessing Higher Level Learning: Developing Rubrics for Case Analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 86 (5): 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.512319
Rodríguez, Alicia (2008). The 'Problem' of Creative Writing: Using Grading Rubrics Based on Narrative Theory as Solution. New Writing. The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 5 (3): 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790720802209963
Rodríguez Romero, Olga Neida (2018). Assessing through rubrics; an effective tool to improve writing in upper secondary students [Tesis de máster]. Universidad de Piura: Piura (Perú). Disponible en https://pirhua.udep.edu.pe/handle/11042/3757
Silvia, Paul J.; Martin, Christopher y Nusbaum, Emily C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4 (2): 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.005
Somasundaran, Swapna; Flor, Michael; Chodorow, Martin; Molloy, Hillary; Gyawalli, Binod y McCulla, Laura (2018). Towards Evaluating Narrative Quality. Student Writing. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6: 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00007
Taylor, Craig y Burke da Silva, Karen (2014). An analysis of the effectiveness of feedback to students on assessed work. Higher Education Research and Development, 33 (4): 794-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863840
Timmerman, Briana Crotwell; Strickland, Denise; Johnson, Robert L. y Payne, John R. (2011). Development of a 'universal' rubric for assessing undergraduates' scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing. Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (5): 509-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903540991
Tung, Chan Kwong (2015). Assessment of Creative Writing: The Case of Singapore Secondary Chinese Language Curriculum. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3 (10): 655-662. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031001
Vaezi, Maryam y Rezaei, Saeed (2019). Development of a rubric for evaluating creative writing: a multi-phase research. New Writing. The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 16 (3): 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2018.1520894
Weigle, Sara Cushing (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.