The language of science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.747n1002Keywords:
Language of science, reconstruction of theories, semiology, physicalism, nominalism, structuralist metatheory, exemplars, resemblance nominalism, infectious diseases, pneumoniaAbstract
From the beginning of philosophy of science, neo positivism proposed physicalism as the basic, common language to all scientific disciplines. We all know of its difficulties and failures. I will analyze the language used in a case of applied –and also basic– research in clinical medicine, so as to evaluate if it is possible an unique language in science, or if it is an unreachable dream. Even when our analysis is structuralist, this case allows us to reconstruct in a natural way the medical clinical theory by means of its exemplars, and not by mathematical models. When we finish our analysis, it will be evident that the old dream of neo-positivism is carried out, and that the language of science –more precisely, the language suitable to reconstruct scientific theories– is a kind of physicalist –and also nominalist– one.
Downloads
References
Balzer, Wolfgang, C. Ulises Moulines y Joseph D. Sneed (1987): An Architectonic for Science, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bambrough, R. (1966): “Universals and Family Resemblance”, en Pitcher, George (ed.) Wittgenstein, New York: Anchor Books, pp. 186-205.
Bennett, Jean Claude y Fred Plum (eds.) (1996): Cecil Textbook of Medicine, Philadelphia/London/Toronto/Montreal/Sydney/Tokio: Saunders Co.
Carnap, Rudolf (1956): “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology”, en Carnap, Rudolf, Meaning and Necessity, enlarged edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 205-221.
Carnap, Rudolf (1958): “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts”, en Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Vol. I, Minnesota: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 38-77.
Cecil, Russell L. y Robert F. Loeb (eds.) (1953): Textbook of Medicine, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.
Field, Hartry (1980): Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; Oxford: Blackwell.
Goodman, Nelson y Willard van Orman Quine (1947): “Towards a Constructive Nominalism”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12: 105-122. doi:10.2307/2266485
Goodman, Nelson (1972): Problems and Projects, Indianapolis, New York: The Babbs Merril Company, Inc.
Hempel, Carl Gustav (1973): “The Meaning of Theoretical Therms: A Critique of the Standard Empiricist Construal”, en Suppes, Patrick, Henkin, Leon, Joja, Athanese y Gr. C. Moisil (eds.) (1973), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 367-378.
Jaeger, Werner (1957): Paideia. Los ideales de la cultura griega, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1971): La estructura de las revoluciones científicas, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Laín Entralgo, Pedro (1973): Historia universal de la medicina, Barcelona: Salvat.
Laín Entralgo, Pedro (1982): La medicina hipocrática, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Lorenzano, César (2002): “Una reconstrucción estructural de la bioquímica” en Díez, José Antonio y Pablo Lorenzano (eds.), Desarrollos actuales de la metateoría estructuralista: problemas y discusiones, Quilmes: Universitat Rovira i Virgili/Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas/Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, pp. 209-231.
Neurath, Otto (1931a): “Physicalism: The philosophy of the Viennese Circle”, The Monist 41: 618-623.
Neurath, Otto (1931b): “Physicalism”, Scientia 50: 297-303.
Neurath, Otto (1983): Philosophical Papers 1913-1946, edited and translated by Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Vienna Circle Collection, Vol. 16, Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo (2000): Resemblance Nominalism. A Solution to the Problem of Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sneed, Joseph D. (1971): The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1973): Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Heidelberg: Springer.
Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1979): The Structuralist View of Theories, Berlin: Springer.
Suppes, Patrick (1960): “A Comparison of the Meaning and Use of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences”, en Suppes, Patrick (1969), Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science. Selected Papers from 1951 to 1969, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 10-24.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958): Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1956): Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
