Rhetorical Argumentation and Controversies: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.747n1013Keywords:
Controversies, argumentative strategies, Origin of Species, On the Genesis of SpeciesAbstract
Charles Darwin and George Mivart once engaged in a famous polemic concerning the origin of species. I will analyze this polemic in the light of the conceptual framework and argumentative strategies of Darwin’s Origin of Species (1872) and Mivart’s On the Genesis of Species (1871). In order to understand the nature of their polemic, I will compare the problems they intended to deal with, their answers as well as their motivations, presuppositions, arguments, and argumentative strategies. In particular, I will focus on Mivart’s objections and Darwin’s responses as part of their argumentative strategies. I will treat refutation in its widest sense (without reducing it to merely proving falsehood) as a collection of procedures to challenge an opponent’s position or proposition.
Downloads
References
Darwin, Charles (1875): The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life (from the 6th English Edition, 1872), New York: Appleton.
Darwin, Francis (org.) (1888): The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols., London: John Murray. Mivart, St. George (1871): On the Genesis of Species, New York: D. Appleton and Co.
Peckam, Morse (ed.) (1959): The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, a Variorum Text, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
