Cyberdemocracy and cyber-campaign: A difficult marriage? The case of Spain's 2008 General Elections

Authors

  • Víctor Sampedro Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • José A. López Rey Universidad de Coruña
  • Celia Muñoz Goy Universidad de Coruña

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2012.756n4003

Keywords:

Ciberdemocracia, cibercampaña, Elecciones Generales, NTIC, internautas, información política

Abstract


The article examines the applicability of the concept of “cyber-campaign” in southern Europe, in the light of data from two specific surveys devised by the authors on the use of digital devices and political information consumption during the 2008 General Election. The first survey addressed general Internet users, and the second users go online more often, referred to here as “intensive Internet users”. Our survey results are compared with patterns of political Internet use by the public in Spain and abroad. Our findings show only limited use of the political resources available online (independent from the slower degree of Internet adoption), along with multi-media consumption of political information (with inherited inertias from traditional mass media consumption) in which the most interactive devices have the least importance. These characteristics are explained by the imbalance between citizens’ demand for online political action during elections and the kind of technological devices and content offered on the Internet by political actors. We detected the existence of a qualitatively important, highly active minority of Internet users that justifies the use of the Net for electoral purposes. Nevertheless, the limitations of the Internet are revealed by the fact that intensive Internet users do not show a higher degree of interest or increased participation in cyber-campaigns than general Internet users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almirón, N. y Jarque, J. M. (2008): El mito digital. Discursos hegemónicos sobre Internet y periodismo. Barcelona, España: Anthropos.

Casero, A. (2007): E-campaña 2007: Internet en las elecciones autonómicas valencianas. En VIII Congreso de la Asociación Española de Ciencia Política y de la Administración 19-21 de septiembre 2007. Valencia, España: Asociación Española de Ciencia Política.

CIS (2007): Barómetro de Octubre. Estudio 2735. Madrid, España: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. [www.cis.es]

CIS Postelectoral (2008): Postelectoral Elecciones Generales y Autonómicas de Andalucía 2008. Panel 2.ª Fase. Estudio 2757. Madrid, España: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. [www.cis.es]

CIS (2008): Barómetro de Julio. Estudio 2769. Madrid, España: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. [www.cis.es]

Ifop (2006): L’observatoire 2006-2007 de la netcampagne présidentielle”. Enquête Ifop-Panel Maximiles. Paris, Francia: IFOP. [www.ifop.com/europe/docs/netcampagne.pdf]

INE (2008): Censo Electoral de 2008. Madrid, España. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. [www.ine.es]

INE (2008): Encuesta de Poiblación Activa (EPA) del segundo trimestre de 2008. Madrid, España. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. [www.ine.es]

INE (2008): Encuesta sobre Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación a Hogares (TIC-H). Madrid, España. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. [www.ine.es]

OECD (2008): Broadband Growth and Policiesin OECD Contries. Seul, Corea: OECD. [www.oecd. org/document/1/0,3343,en_2649_34223_40931201_1_1_1_1,00. html]

Padró-Solanet, A. y Cardenal, A. (2008): “Partidos y política en Internet: Un análisis de los websites de los partidos políticos catalanes”, Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, 6, pp. 46-64.

Prensky, M. (2001): “Digital natives, digital immigrants”. On the Horizon, 9(5), pp. 1-6. [www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky% 20%20Digital%20Natives,%20 Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20 Part1.pdf] http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Smith, A. y Rainie, L. (2008): The internet and the 2008 election. Washington: EE.UU. Pew Internet and American Life Project. [www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/252/report_display.asp]

Sudulich, M. (2009): “Do ethos, ideology, country and electoral strength make a difference in cyberspace? Testing an explanatory model of parties’ websites”, en ECPR Joint Session April 2009, Lisbon, Portugal: ECPR.

TNS-Sofres (2007): Les internautes et la politique. Paris, Francia: Sofres. [http://www.tns-sofres.com].

Vaccari, C. (2008a): “Più informazione che partecipazione: i siti Internet dei partiti nella campagna elettorale 2008”, Comunicazione Politica, IX(2), pp. 183-198.

Vaccari, C. (2008b): “Surfing to the Élysée: The Internet in the 2007 French Elections”, French Politics, 6, pp. 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200139

Vaccari, C. (2008c): “Italian Parties’ Websites in the 2006 Elections”, European Journal of Communication, 23(1), pp. 69-77. [http:/ ejc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/23/1/69]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323107085839

Vedel, T. y Michalska, K. (2007): “Political Participation and the Internet: Evidence from the 2007 French Presidential Election”, en International Conference on e-Government 27-28 September. Montreal, Canada: ICEG.

Winneg, K. et al. (2008): Internet as Political Information Tool Popular, But Television Still Dominates. Pennsylvania, EE.UU. National Annenberg Election Survey, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. [www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/Downloads/Releases/NAES%202008/News-ConsumptionMARCH28_2008.pdf].

UNCTAD (2007): Information economy report 2007-2008. Science and technology for development: the new paradigm of ICT. New York-Geneve: United Nations. [www.unctad.org/Templates/webflyer.asp?docid=9479&intItemID=1397&lang=1]

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2008): Networked Nation: Broadband in America 2007, January 2008. Washington, EE.UU: Government of United States of America [www.ntia.doc.gov/ reports/2008/NetworkedNation.html]

Downloads

Published

2012-08-30

How to Cite

Sampedro, V., López Rey, J. A., & Muñoz Goy, C. (2012). Cyberdemocracy and cyber-campaign: A difficult marriage? The case of Spain’s 2008 General Elections. Arbor, 188(756), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2012.756n4003

Issue

Section

Articles