Si Zubiri pudiera discutir con la bioética actual: inteligencia y neurociencia

Lydia Feito Grande

doi:10.3989/arbor.2016.780n4006

Authors

Lydia Feito Grande Universidad Complutense de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2016.780n4006

Keywords:

Zubiri, neuroethics, bioethics, neuroscience, consciousness, intelligence, nature, reality

Abstract

Philosophers are products of their time. Their standpoints, themes and perspectives are a result of a historical time, a knowledge and a prevailing paradigm throughout their epoch. Zubiri is a good example of a philosopher who wants to be in touch with the science and knowledge of his time, but is an author from the XX century. Contemporary bioethics includes a profusion of themes that undoubtedly would have fascinated Zubiri, in as far as they relate to a reflection on the human condition itself. Specifically, the development of neurosciences is challenging to thought, and is producing a correlative development of so-called neuroethics. From this new scenario, this paper deals with those ideas that Zubiri would have discussed in the context of contemporary neuroethics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bayne, T. (2004). Closing the gap? Some questions for neurophenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3-4, pp. 349- 364. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048934.34397.ca

Bennett, M., Dennett, D., Hacker, P. y Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bennett, M. R. y Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Wiley-Blackwell.

Brook, A. y Akins, K. (eds.) (2005). Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610608

Calderón de la Barca, P. (1647/1997) La vida es sue-o. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. PMid:9283013

Changeux, J.-P. y Ricoeur, P. (1999). Lo que nos hace pensar. La naturaleza y la regla. Barcelona: Península.

Churchland, P. (1987) Epistemology in the age of neuroscience. The Journal of Philosophy, 84, 10, pp. 544-553. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil1987841026

Churchland, P. (1989). Neurophilosophy: toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Feito, L. (2008). Cerebros de mujeres y cerebros de hombres ¿Conflicto de racionalidades? En: Feito, L. (ed.) El conflicto de racionalidades. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia de Comillas, pp. 205-215.

Gallagher, S. y Varela, F. (2001). Redrawing the map and resetting the time: phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. En: Crowell, S., Embree, L. y Julian, S. J. (eds.) The reach of reflection: issues for the phenomenology's second century. Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology.

Gracia, D. (2009). Zubiri en los retos actuales de la antropología. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía, 36, pp. 103-152.

Laín Entralgo, P. (1989). El cuerpo humano. Teoría actual. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Laín Entralgo, P. (1991). Cuerpo y alma. Madrid: Espasa Calpe. PMid:1767882

Metzinger, T. (2000). Introduction: Consciousness research at the end of the twentieth century. En: Metzinger, T. (ed.) Neural correlates of consciousness. Empirical and conceptual questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1-16.

Noë, A. (2010). Fuera de la cabeza. Por qué no somos el cerebro y otras lecciones de la biología de la conciencia. Barcelona: Kairós.

Petitot, J., Varela, F., Pachoud, B. y Roy, J. M. (eds.) (1999). Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Pinker, S. (1995). El instinto del lenguaje: cómo crea el lenguaje la mente. Madrid: Alianza.

Pinker, S. (2001). Cómo funciona la mente. Madrid: Destino.

Pinker, S. (2003). La tabla rasa. La negación moderna de la naturaleza humana. Barcelona: Paidós. PMCid:PMC153705

Pinker, S. (2010). The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences. [On line]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914630107 PMid:20445094 PMCid:PMC3024014

Quine, W. v. O. (1969). Epistemology naturalized. En: Quine, W. v. O. Ontological Relativity and other Essays. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Varela (1996) Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3-4, pp. 330-349.

Varela (1997). The naturalization of phenomenology as the transcendence of nature: searching for generative mutual constraints. Alter: Revue de Phénoménologie, 5, pp. 355-385.

Wiehl, R. (1992). Hermenéutica, Metafísica, Ética. La filosofía en lengua alemana durante las últimas décadas del siglo XX. Isegoría, 15, pp. 93-118. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.1992.i5.340

Zubiri, X. (1963). El hombre, realidad personal. Revista de Occidente, 1, pp. 5-29.

Zubiri, X. (1984a). El hombre y Dios. Madrid: Alianza. PMid:6546166

Zubiri, X. (1984b). Inteligencia y Realidad. Madrid: Alianza. PMid:6546166

Zubiri, X. (1986). Sobre el hombre. Madrid: Alianza.

Zubiri, X. (1987). Naturaleza, Historia, Dios. Madrid: Alianza.

Zubiri, X. (2002). Sobre el problema de la filosofía y otros escritos (1932-1944). Madrid: Alianza.

Zubiri, X. (2004). Sentido de la vida intelectual. En: Nicolás, J. A. y Barroso, O. (eds.) Balance y perspectivas de la filosofía de X. Zubiri. Granada: Comares. PMid:15491432

Zubiri, X. (2005). El hombre: lo real y lo irreal. Madrid: Alianza / Fundación Xavier Zubiri. PMid:16257653