New scenarios and challenges for open science. Between optimism and uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2021.799001Keywords:
Open Science, COVID-19, open access, citizen science, open dataAbstract
This article provides an overview of the new scenarios facing Open Science in a context marked by the micro and macro structural challenges the COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light. First, policies are described in the field of open access, the launching pad for Open Science, and the resistance these practices still face. Also analysed is the participation of different social actors in processes to construct scientific knowledge, through participatory research and citizen science practices, as well as the growing supremacy of data. The main structural tensions that appear in open processes are also discussed, analysing the construction of public policies on Open Science. In closing, a reflection is presented on the current situation, where the coronavirus epidemic is showing the increasingly central role that open practices have and will have in our society.
Downloads
References
Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick y Mueller-Langer, Frank (2014). Open access to data: An ideal professed but not practised. Research Policy, 43(9): 1621-1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008
Arza, Valeria y Fressoli, Mariano (2017). Systematizing benefits of open science practices. Information Services and Use, 37(4): 463-474. Disponible en: https://content.iospress.com/articles/information-services-and-use/isu861. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170861
Arza, Valeria; Fressoli, Mariano; Actis, Guillermina y del Castillo, Martín (2019). La ciencia abierta en América Latina. Reporte realizado para el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Montevideo, Mimeo.
Bastani, Aaron (2019). Fully Automated Luxury Communism: a manifiesto, London: Verso Books.
Belansky, Elaine; Cutforth, Nick; Chavez, Robert; Waters, Emily y BartlettHorch, Kandiss (2011). An adapted version of intervention mapping (AIM) is a tool for conducting community-based participatory research. Health Promot. Pract, 12: 440-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839909334620 PMid:19515863
Besançon, Lionni, Peiffer-Smadja, Nathan, Segalas, Corentin, Jiang, Haiting, Masuzzo, Paola, Smout, Cooper, Deforet, Maxime y Leyrat, Clémence (2020), Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic, BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.13.249847
Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, (2003). Accesible en: https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration
Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing, (2003). Accesible en: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
Brynjolfsson, Erick y McAfee, Andrew (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Choudhury, Suparna; Fishman, Jennifer R.; McGowan, Michelle L. y Juengst, Eric T. (2014). Big data, open science and the brain: lessons learned from genomics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8: 239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00239 PMid:24904347 PMCid:PMC4032989
Conrad, Cathy y Hilchey, Krista (2011). A review of citizen science and community- based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environ. Monit. Assess, 176: 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5 PMid:20640506
Contreras, Jorge; Eisen, Michel y Peters Diane (2020). COVID-19: save lives with open intellectual-property licences. Nature 583, 683. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02233-4 PMid:32724145
Declaración de Panamá para la Ciencia Abierta (2018). Recuperado de https://hiperderecho.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/declaracion_panama_ciencia_abierta.pdf
De Filippo, Daniela; Silva, Paulo; Borges, María Manuel (2019). Caracterización de las publicaciones de España y Portugal sobre Open Science y análisis de su presencia en las redes sociales. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 42 (2), e235. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2019.2.1580
De Filippo, Daniela y D'Onofrio, María Guillermina (2019). Alcances y limitaciones de la ciencia abierta en Latinoamérica: análisis de las políticas públicas y publicaciones científicas de la región. Hipertext.net, (19): 32-48. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2019.i19.03
De Filippo, Daniela; Bautista-Puig, Nuria; Mauleón, Elaba; Sanz-Casado, Elías (2018). A Bridge between Society and Universities: a Documentary analysis of science shops. Publications 6 (3): 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6030036
Edwards, Paul; Mayernik, Matew; Batcheller, Archer; Bowker, Geofrey y Borgman, Cristine (2011). Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 41(5): 667˗690. Accesible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41301955 https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711413314 PMid:22164720
España. Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Secretaría de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (2017). Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020. Accesible en: http://www.idi.mineco.gob.es/stfls/MICINN/Prensa/FICHEROS/2018/PlanEstatalIDI.pdf
EUR-Lex (2012). COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 17 July 2012 on access to and preservation of scientific information (2012/417/EU). Official Journal of the European Union, 39-43. Accesible en: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/48558fc9-d4c8-11e1-905c-01aa75ed71a1
European Commission (2017) Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science Practices. Accesible en: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_rewards_wgreport_final.pdf
Finland. The Ministry of Education and Culture's Open Science and Research Initiative 2014-2017 (2014). The Open Science and Research Roadmap. Reports of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland, 2014:21. Accesible en: http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/75210/okm21.pdf
Forsström, Pirjo-Leena; Haataja, Juha. (2016). Open Science as an Instrument for Effective Research. Signum, 2 : 11˗15. Accesible en: http://ojs.tsv.fi/index.php/signum/article/viewFile/58741/20303
Fressoli, Mariano y Arza, Valeria (2018). Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas de ciencia abierta. Teknokultura. Revista de cultura digital y movimientos sociales, 15(2): 429˗448. https://doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.60616
Gurevitch, Jessica; Koricheva, Julia; Nakagawa, Shinichi y Steward, Gavin (2018). Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature 555: 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25753 PMid:29517004
Hey, Tony; Tansley, Steward y Tolle, Kristin (2009). The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft research.
Irwin, Alan (1995). Citizen Science: a Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. Routledge: Abingdon, UK.
LA Referencia: Red de Repositorios de Acceso Abierto a la Ciencia (2019). Compartiendo y dando visibilidad a la producción científica en América Latina. Accesible en: http://www.lareferencia.info/es/institucional/quienes-somos
Leonelli, Sabine; Rappert, Brian y Davies, Gail (2017). Data Shadows: Knowledge, Openness, and Absence. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(2): 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916687039
Mirowski, Philip (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2): 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086 PMid:29726809
Netherlands. Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (2017). National Plan Open Science.
Nielsen, Michael (2011). Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691202853
OECD (2015). Making Open Science a Reality. OECD Science, Tecnology and Industy Policy Papers, 25. Paris: OECD Publications.
ONU (2014). A world that counts. Mobilising the data revolution for sustainable development. Accesible en: https://www.undatarevolution.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/A-World-That-Counts.pdf
Portugal. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (MCTES) (2016). Ciência Aberta, Conhecimento para todos: Princípios orientadores. Accesible en: https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/content/ciencia-aberta-conhecimento-para-todos
Raddick, Jordan; Bracey, Georgia; Gay, Pamela; Lintott, Chris; Cardamone, Carie; Murray, Phil; Schawinski, Kevin; Szalay, Alexander y Vandenberg, Jan (2013). Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists.arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.6886. https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2011021
Riesch, Hauke y Potter, Clive (2014). Citizen Science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science, 23: 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513497324 PMid:23982281
Scheliga, Kaja y Friesike, Sascha. (2014). Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma? First Monday, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381
Sullivan, Braian; Wood, Chris; Iliff, Marshal; Bonney, Robert; Fink, Daniel y Kelling,
Steve. (2009) eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142: 2282-2292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006
Toelch, Ulf y Ostwald, Dirk (2018). Digital open science-Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research. PLoS Biology, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006022 PMid:30048447 PMCid:PMC6095603
Wright, Leslie; King, Diane; Retrum, Jessica; Helander, Kenneth; Wilkins, Shari; Boggs, Jennifer; Portz, Jennifer; Nearing, Kathryn y Gozansky, Wendolyn (2017). Lessons learned from community- based participatory research: Establishing a partnership to support lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender ageing in place. Family Practice, 34(3): 330-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx005 PMid:28334786 PMCid:PMC6279214
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
