Public Attitudes and Behaviors about COVID-19 in the United States: A case study in issue understanding in a polarized political system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2022.806008Keywords:
COVID-19, polarized political system, Unites States, Generation XAbstract
How do citizens in a polarized political system react to an unexpected emergency like the COVID-19 pandemic and how do citizens process conflicting polarized narratives to formulate a public policy view of the threat of the pandemic? The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic is a health emergency unlike anything in the United States since the polio epidemic 70 years ago, but the political climate of the U.S. in the 1950’s was far more centrist and consensual than the deep divisions observed today. This paper will utilize data from a 35-year longitudinal study of Generation X young adults (now in their mid-40’s) and a three-decade time series of national U.S. surveys to examine information acquisition behaviors to understand the new threat. Our analysis of the last 35 years of Generation X finds that polarized ideological partisanship was the strongest single predictor of individual votes in the 2020 election, but that individuals with a higher level of understanding of the coronavirus were more critical of the Trump Administration’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and were more likely to vote for Biden than Trump. A parallel analysis of a national probability sample of U.S. adults in 2020 found the same pattern of influence from ideological partisanship, coronavirus understanding, and assessment of the Trump Administration’s handling of the pandemic. The results indicate that knowledge and understanding can provide a critical balancing effect in an evenly divided polarized political system.
Downloads
References
Abramowitz, Alan I. (2010). The Disappearing Center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Abramowitz, Alan I. (2018). The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhrczh3
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L. (2006). Exploring the bases of partisanship in the American electorate: Social identity versus ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900201
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Webster, Steven W. (2018). Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties but Behave Like Rabid Partisans. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(Suppl. 1), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479
Algara, Carlos; Amlani, Sharif; Collitt, Samuel et al. (2022). Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x
Amlani, Sharif and Algara, Carlos. (2021). Partisanship and nationalism in American elections: Evidence from presidential, senatorial, and gubernatorial elections in U.S, counties, 1872-2020. Electoral Studies 73(October 1), 102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102387
Bengtson, Vern L., Biblarz, Timothy J., and Roberts, Roberts E. (2002). How Families Still Matter: A longitudinal study of youth in two generations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bernacer, Javier; Garcia-Manglano, Javier; Camina, Eduardo and Güell, Francisco (2021). Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain. PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0254511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254511 PMid:34255781 PMCid:PMC8277027
Bartels, Larry and Jackman, Simon (2013). A generational model of political learning. Electoral Studies, 33, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.004
Burns, James McGregor (1963). The Deadlock of Democracy: Four-party politics in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Campbell, Angus; Converse, Philip E.; Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955648
Carmines, Edward. G. and Stimson, James A. (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691218250 PMid:2544103
Carsey, Thomas M. and Layman, Geoffrey C. (2006). Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 464-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00196.x
Castle, Jeremiah J. and Stepp, Kyla K. (2021). Partianship, religion, and issue polarization in the United States: A reassessment. Political Behavior, 43, 1311-1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09668-5
Ceci, Stephen J. and Papierno, Paul B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: When the "have-nots" gain but the "haves" gain even more. American Psychologist, 60(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.149 PMid:15740447
Claassen, Ryan L.; Djupe, Paul A.; Lewis, Andrew R. and Neiheisel, Jacob R. (2021). Which party represents my group? The group foundations of partisan choice and polarization. Political Behavior, 43, 615-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09565-6
Conis, Elena (2017). Polio, DDT, and disease risk in the United States after World War II. Environmental History, 22, 696-721. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emx086
Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press. Reprinted in Critical Review 18(1-3), 1-74. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
Converse, Philip E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In Edward R. Tufte (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Converse, Philip E. (1974). Nonattitudes and American public opinion: Comment: The status of nonattitudes. American Political Science Review, 68, 650-660. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959510
Cramer, Katherine J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226349251.001.0001
Dannefer, Dale (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58(6), S327-S337. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327 PMid:14614120
Dannefer, Dale (2020). Systemic and reflexive: Foundations of cumulative dis/advantage and life course processes. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 75(6), 1249-1263. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby118 PMid:30295844
Dawson, Richard R. and Prewitt, Kenneth (1969). Political Socialization. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Finkel, Eli J.; Bail, Christopher A.; Cikara, Mina; Ditto, Peter. H.; Iyengar, Shanto; Klar, Samara; Mason, Lilliana; McGrath, Mary. C.; Nyhan, Brendan; Rand, David G.; Skitka, Linda J.; Tucker, Joshua. A.; Van Bavel, Jay J.; Wang, Cynthia. S.; Druckman, James N. (2021). Political Sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533-536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715 PMid:33122374
Fowler, A., Hill, S., Lewis, J., Tausanovitch, C., Vavereck, L., & Warshaw, C. (2022). Moderates. American Political Science Review, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000818
Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M. (2011). The politicization of evidence-based medicine: The limits of pragmatic problem solving in an era of polarization. California Journal of Politics and Policy, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.5070/P2MS3P
Guntermann, Eric; Lenz, Gabriel S. and Myers, Jeffrey R. (2021). The impact of the economy on presidential elections throughout US history. Political Behavior, 43, 837-857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09677-y
Hayduk, Leslie A. (1987). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801834783
Hetherington, Marc. J.; Long, Meri T. and Rudolph, Thomas J. (2016). Revisiting the myth: New evidence of a polarized electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80 (Special issue), 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw003
Hillygus, D. Sunshine and Shields, Todd G. (2008). The Persuadable Voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831593
Hochschild, Jennifer L. and Einstein, Katherine L. (2015). Do Facts Matter? Normal, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Hyman, Herbert H. (1959). Political Socialization: A study in the psychology of political behavior. New York: The Free Press.
Hyman, Herbert H. and Wright, Charles R. (1979). Education's Lasting Influence on Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hyman, Herbert H.; Wright, Charles R., and Reed, John S. (1975). The Enduring Effects of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto and Westwood, Sean J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
Iyengar, Shanto; Sood, Gaurav and Lelkes, Yphtach (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
Iyengar, Shanto; Lelkes, Yphtach M.; Levendusky, Matthew; Malhotra, Neil and Westwood, Sean J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
Jacobson, Gary C. (2021). The presidential and congressional elections of 2020: A national referendum on the Trump presidency. Political Science Quarterly, 136, 11-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13133
Jöreskog, Karl and Sörbom, Dag (1993). LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Lee, Valerine E. and Burkam, David T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
Lelkes, Yphtach (2016). Mass polarization: Manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(Special issue), 392-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw005
Lelkes, Yphtach (2018.) Affective polarization and ideological sorting: A reciprocal, albeit weak, relationship. The Forum, 16(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0005
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mason, Lilliana (2015). "I disrespectfully disagree": The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089
Mason, Lilliana (2016). A crosscutting calm: How social sorting drives affective polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(Special issue), 351-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw001
Mason, Lilliana (2018a.) Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001
Mason, Lilliana (2018b). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(Special Issue), 866-887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005
Mason, Lilliana and Wronski, Julie (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(suppl. 1), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12485
McCright, Aaron and Dunlap, Riley (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly 52(2), 155-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
Mendoza Aviña, Marco and Sevi, Senra (2021). Did exposure to COVID-19 affect vote choice in the 2020 Presidential Election? Research & Politics 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211041505
Miller, Jon D. (1983). The American People and Science Policy: The Role of Public Attitudes in the Policy Process. New York: Pergamon Press.
Miller, Jon D. (2010). Adult Science Learning in the Internet Era. Curator, 53(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2010.00019.x
Miller, Jon D. and Inglehart, Ronald F. (2012). American Attitudes toward Science and Technology. In William S. Bainbridge (ed.), Leadership in Science and Technology: A reference handbook (Vol. 1) (pp. 298-306). New York: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412994231.n34
Miller, Jon D. and Kreps, Gary L. (2010). Biological Literacy: A key to cancer prevention and control in the 21st century. In Lila Rutten, Bradley W. Hesse, Richard P. Moser, and Gary L. Kreps (eds.), Building the Evidence Base in Cancer Communication (pp. 225-247) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Miller, Jon D. and Laspra, Belén (2017). Generation X in mid-life: A summary from the Longitudinal Study of American Life. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 41(3), 27-33.
Miller, Jon D., Woods, Logan T., and Kalmbach, Jason. (2022). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election. Electoral Studies 80:102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548 PMid:36311165 PMCid:PMC9595380
Miller, Jon D.; Kalmbach, Jason; Woods, Logan T. and Cepuran, Claire (2020). The accuracy and value of voter validation in national surveys: Insights from longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. Political Research Quarterly, 74(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920903432
Miller, Jon D.; Ackerman, Mark S.; Laspra, Belén and Huffaker, Jordan S. (2021). The acquisition of health and science information in the 21st century. The Information Society, 37(2), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2020.1870022
Muldoon, Orla T.; Liu, James H.; and McHugh, Cillian. (2021). The political psychology of COVID-19. Political Psychology 42(5):715-728. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12775 PMid:34548719 PMCid:PMC8447463
Pacheco, Julianna S. and Plutzer, Eric (2008). Political participation and cumulative disadvantage: The impact of economic and social hardship on young citizens. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 571-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00578.x
Rossiter, Clinton (1966). 1787: The Grand Convention. New York: Macmillian. https://doi.org/10.2307/1371478
Ruisch et al., (2021). Examining the Left-Right Divide Through the Lens of a Global Crisis: Ideological Differences and Their Implications for Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Political Psychology, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12740 PMid:34226775 PMCid:PMC8242330
Sapolsky, Harvey (1968). Science, voters, and the fluoridation controversy. Science 162 (3852), 427-433. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3852.427 PMid:5683048
Sexton, Patricia. C. (1961). Education and income: Inequalities of opportunity in our public schools. New York: Viking Press.
Verba, Sidney; Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay L. (2003). Unequal at the Starting Line: Creating Participatory Inequalities across generations and among groups. The American Sociologist 34(1-2), 45-69 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-003-1005-y
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
Funding data
National Science Foundation
Grant numbers MDR8550085;REC96-27669;RED-9909569;REC-0337487;DUE-0525357;DUE-0712842;DUE-0856695;DRL-0917535;HRD-1348619
National Institute on Aging
Grant numbers 5R01AG049624-02
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Grant numbers NNX16AC66A