The reasons of cosmic silence. Eidetic variations about Fermi´s Paradox with Stanislaw Lem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2024.811.2712Keywords:
extraterrestrial life, Fermi´s paradox, Stanislaw Lem, phenomenology, rationalityAbstract
In this paper I exam possible reasons of failure of our discovery of extraterrestrial species in the Universe. After a brief look on Fermi´s Paradox, different causes are being suggested for our incapacity to recognize other civilizations or rational beings. I am doing so taking Stanislaw Lem´s science fiction novels as a leading clue. Possible reasons points to the human inability to embrace «Copernican humility», the idea that humans are merely inhabitants of a region of the Universe rather than measure of all things. The difficulty in self-relativizing leads, on the one hand, to the failure in acknowledge other living beings as such – as shown in the second section – and, on the other, inability to conceive other forms of communication. Thus, in the last step, the paper invites to re-exam our way of thinking of rationality and encourages to perform eidetic variations in order to conceive of different ways of multiplanetary cohabitation. The issue of Contact ultimately reveals itself, according to our analysis of Lem´s novels, as anthropological and subjective in its nature, not necessarily objective. This is achieved by pointing out briefly two possible ways of understanding the meaning of transcendentality and rationality in phenomenology.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, Stuart y Sandberg, Anders (2013). Eternity in six hours: Intergalactic spreading of intelligent life and sharpening the Fermi paradox. Acta Astronautica, 89, 1–13.
Blandzi, Seweryn (2012). Gorgiasza meontología vs nihilizm . Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal, 2(2), 245-264.
Bula, Germán y Pérez-Lora, Oscar (2022). Sobre la hipótesis de la Tierra rara como solución a la paradoja de Fermi: desde la humildad copernicana hasta la gratitud ante Gaia y el asombro activo. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 22(44), 11-34.
Csicsery-Ronay, IstvanJr. (1991). The Modeling Chaosphere: Stanislaw Lem´s Allien Communication. En N. Katherine Hayles (ed.), Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science (pp. 244-262). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Di Natale, Anna Flavia; Simonetti, Matilde Ellen; La Rocca, Stefania y Bricolo, Emanuela (2023). Uncanny valley effect: A qualitative synthesis of empirical research to assess the suitability of using virtual faces in psychological research. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10, 100288.
Empírico, Sexto (2012). Contra los Dogmáticos. Madrid: Gredos.
Expósito Ropero, Noé (2020). La relación entre antropología y fenomenología según Ludwig Landgrebe. A propósito del escrito en homenaje a Antonio Zirión. Acta Mexicana de Fenomenología, 5, 323-350.
Gray, Robert H. (2015). The Fermi Paradox Is Neither Fermi´s Nor a Paradox. Astrobiology 15(3), 195-199. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/ast.2014.1247.
Haraway, Donna J. (2019). Seguir con el problema. Generar parentesco en el Chthuluceno. Bilbao: Consonni.
Hart, Michael H. (1975). An Explanation for the Absence of Extraterrestrials on Earth. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 16, 128-135.
Heinämaa, Sara (2014). The Animal and the Infant: From Embodiment and Empathy to Generativity. En Sara Heinämaa, Mirja Hartimo y Timo Miettinen (eds.), Phenomenology and the Transcendental (pp. 129-146). Nueva York: Routledge.
Husserl, Edmund (1995). La tierra no se mueve. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.
Husserl, Edmund (2009). Meditaciones Cartesianas. Madrid: Tecnos.
Jardine, James y Szanto, Thomas (2017). Empathy in the Phenomenological Tradition. En Heidi Maibom, The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy.Oxford: Routledge.
Jarzębski, Jerzy (1999). Czarny Scenariusz. Epílogo a Fiasco .Recuperado de https://solaris.lem.pl/ksiazki/beletrystyka/fiasko/73-poslowie-fiasko
Kowalewski, Hubert (2015). In Space No One Can Hear You Speak. Extrapolation, 56(3), 353-376.
Lem, Stanisław (1987). Fiasko. Cracovia: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Lem, Stanislaw (2011[1961]). Solaris. Madrid: Impedimenta. Versión e-pub.
Márquez Lugo, Alejandro (1 de mayo de 2024). Minería espacial y vida alienígena: ¿qué nos enseña La Controversia de Valladolid sobre ética en el universo? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/mineria-espacial-y-vida-alienigena-que-nos-ensena-la-controversia-de-valladolid-sobre-etica-en-el-universo-226157
Menor-Salván, César (31 de agosto de 2023). Qué respondemos los científicos a la pregunta: “¿estamos solos en la galaxia?” The Conversation.https://theconversation.com/que-respondemos-los-cientificos-a-la-pregunta-estamos-solos-en-la-galaxia-211751
Mori, Masahiro (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
Oramus, Dominika (2006). Czy androidy marzą o pilocie Pirxie? Android w wybranych utworach Stanisława Lema, Philipa K. Dicka i J. G. Ballarda. Postscriptum, 1(51), 157-170.
Sánchez Carraceno, Fermín (27 de febrero de 2020). ¿Dónde se esconden los extraterrestres? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/donde-se-esconden-los-extraterrestres-132405
San Martín, Javier (2020). Quinta Estación en el debate sobre fenomenología y antropología. Acta Mexicana de la fenomenología, 5, 201-240.
Simons, Massimiliano (2021). A Philosophy of First Contact. Stanislaw Lem and the Myth of Cognitive Universality. Pro-Fil, 22(3), 65-77.
Slawkowska-Rode, Monika Anna y Slawkowski-Rode, Mikolaj (2021). Revisiting Solaris: Encountering Otherness and the Limits of Representation. Pro-Fil (Special Issue), 2278-91. https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/144852
Zirión, Antonio (2015). Prólogo. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, 12, 209-220
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
Funding data
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Grant numbers PID2020-117413GA-I00