Knowledge Adquisition Strategies in Firm Innovation Proce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2009.738n1052Keywords:
Innovation strategies, cost transaction theory, firm capabilitiesAbstract
The recognition of external agents as an important knowledge source to innovation processes means that the firms must face a key decision: generate in-house or acquire externally the required technological knowledge. Owing to its implications, this decision has become a very important topic between academics and practitioners of innovation, promoting the development of a body of theoretical and empirical literature about the factors and motivations which influence it. This paper provides a review of this literature via the analysis of three innovation strategies (make, buy, and cooperate) and considers the contributions coming from transaction cost theory and the firms’ capabilities viewpoint.
Downloads
References
Arrow, K. (1962): “The economic implications of learning by doing”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, pp. 155- 173. doi:10.2307/2295952
Arora, A. y Gambardella, A. (1994): “Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability and external linkages in biotechnology”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 24, pp. 91-114. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)90055-8
Arora, A. y Gambardella, A. (1990): “Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology”, Industrial Economics, vol. 38, pp. 361-379. doi:10.2307/2098345
Athey, S. y Stern, S. (1998): “An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design”, NBER working paper, 6600.
Benavides, C. (1998): Tecnología, innovación y empresa, Madrid, Pirámide.
Belderbos, R.; Carree, M.; Diederen, B.; Lokshin, B. y Veugelers, R. (2004): “Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 22, pp. 1237-1263. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001
Beneito, P. (2003): “Choosing among alternative technological strategies: An empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation”, Research Policy, vol. 32, pp. 693-713. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00079-3
Bönte, W. (2003): “R&D and productivity: Internal vs external R&D – evidence from West German manufacturing industries”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 12, pp. 343- 360. doi:10.1080/10438590290018415
Cassiman, B. y Veugelers, R. (2006): “In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition”, Management Science, vol. 52, pp. 68-82. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
Chesnais, F. (1996): “Technological agreements, networks and selected issues in economic theory”, en R. Coombs, A. Richards, P. Saviotti y V. Walsh (eds.), Technological Collaboration. The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Cohen, W. M. y Levinthal, D. A. (1990): “Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, pp. 128-152. doi:10.2307/2393553
Coombs, R. (1996): ”Core competences and the strategic management of R&D”, R&D Management, vol. 26, pp. 345- 355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00970.x
Croisier, B. (1998): “The governance of external research: Empirical testing of some transaction-cost related factors”, R&D management, vol. 28, pp. 289-298. doi:10.1111/1467-9310.00105
Freel, M. (2003): “Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity”, Research Policy, vol. 32, pp. 751-770. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7
Hagedoorn, J. (2002): “Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since1960”, Research Policy, vol. 31, pp. 477-492. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
Howells, J. (1999): “Regional systems of innovation?”, en D. Archibugi, J. Howells, J. Michie (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Laursen, K. y Salter, A. (2006): “Open for Innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among U.K. manufacturing firms”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27, pp. 131-150. doi:10.1002/smj.507
Lowe, J. y Taylor, P. (1998): “R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: Complementarity strategies and complementarity assets”, R&D Management, vol. 28, pp. 263- 278. doi:10.1111/1467-9310.00103
Maidique, M. A. y Zirguer, B. J. (1985): “The new product learning cycle”, Research Policy, vol. 14, pp. 299-313. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90001-0
Mariti, P. y Smiley, R. H. (1983): “Co-operative agreements and the organization of industry”, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 31, pp. 437-451. doi:10.2307/2098340
Martínez Sánchez, A. (1989): “La gestión estratégica de la tecnología”, Alta Dirección, vol. 146 (julio-agosto), pp. 87-98.
Milgrom, P. y Roberts, J. (1990): “The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization”, American Economic Review, vol. 80, pp. 511-528.
Miotti, L. y Sachwald, F. (2003): “Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integral framework of analysis”, Research Policy, vol. 32, pp. 1481-1499. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
Mowery, D. C. (1983): “The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940”, Exploration in Economics History, vol. 20, pp. 351-374. doi:10.1016/0014-4983(83)90024-4
Mowery, D. C. y Rosenberg, N. (1989): Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, R. (2000): “National innovation systems”, en Z. Acs (ed.), Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change, London, Pinter.
Oerlemans, L.; Meeus, M. y Boekema, F. (1998): “Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 89, pp. 298-309. doi:10.1111/1467-9663.00029
Oerlemans, L. y Meeus, M. (2001): “R&D cooperation in a transaction cost perspective”, Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 18, pp. 77-90. doi:10.1023/A:1026485426095
Pisano, G. (1989): “Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 5, p. 109.
Pisano, G. (1990): “The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, p. 153. doi:10.2307/2393554
Rosenberg, N. (1982): Inside the black box. Technology and economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Sakakibara, M. (1997): “Evaluating government- sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?”, Research Policy, vol. 26, pp. 447-473. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00018-8
Teece, D. J.; Pisano, G. P. y Shuen, A. (1997): “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, pp. 509-533. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tyler, B. B. y Steensma, H. K. (1995): “Evaluating Technological Collaborative Opportunities: A Cognitive Modelling Perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16, pp. 43-70. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160917
Veugelers, R. (1997): “Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing”, Research Policy, vol. 26, pp. 303-315. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00019-X
Veugelers, R. (1998): “Collaboration in R&D: An Assessment of Theoretical and Empirical Findings”, De Economist, vol. 146, pp. 419-443. doi:10.1023/A:1003243727470
Wernerfelt, B. (1984): “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, pp. 171-180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207
Williamson, Oliver E. (1981): “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 87, pp. 548-577. doi:10.1086/227496
Williamson, Oliver E. (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York, The Free Press.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1996): The mechanisms of Governance, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.