Transposing the Aboriginal gaze: Rabbit-proof Fence and intertextual mediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2010.741n1010Keywords:
Australia, aborigenes, Stolen Generations, intertextuality, cinema, oral narratives, historyAbstract
Following recent developments in adaptation studies, which tend to interrogate the intertextual relations between the written and the visual, this article analyses Rabbit-Proof Fence (Noyce, 2002), in terms of the complex intertextuality which brings it together: the source-book, Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence (1996) by Doris Pilkington-Garimara; the Bringing Them Home (1997) report, about the forced separation of Aboriginal children from their families; the texts and political action for national reconciliation in Australia, and finally, the biographies and participation of the young actors and their indigenous communities. All contribute to the visual transfer and articulation of a film in which the interweaving of history and art is a constitutive element.
Downloads
References
Brewster, Anne (2002): “Aboriginal life writing and globalisation: Doris Pilkington’s, Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence”, Australian Humanities Review, 25. http//www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-March-2002/brewster.html.
Brewster, Anne (2007): “The Stolen Generations: Rites of Passage: Doris Pilkington Interviewed by Anne Brewster”, Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 42.1, 143-159. doi:10.1177/0021989407075735
Cain, Deborah (2004): “A fence Too Far? Postcolonial Guilt and the Myth of distance in Rabbit-Proof Fence”, Third Text, 18: 4, 297-303. doi:10.1080/0952882042000229881
Hooks, Bell (1992): “The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectators”, Black Looks, Race and Representation, Londres, turnaround, 115-131.
Hughes-D’aeth, Tony (2002): “Which Rabbit-Proof Fence? Empathy, Assimilation, Hollywood”, Australian Humanities Review 27. http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-September-2002/hughesdaeth.html.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (1997): Bringing Them Home, Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Straits Islander Children from Their Families.
Hucheon, Linda (2006): A Theory of Adaptation, N. York, Routledge.
Leitch, Thomas (2008): “Adaptation Studies at a Crossroads”, Adaptation, 1: 1, 63-77. doi:10.1093/adaptation/apm005
Manne, Robert (2002): “The Colour of Prejudice”, Sydney Morning Herald, 23 February.
McCarthy, Greg (2003): “The Obstinate Memory in Australian Films”, www.utas.edu.au/government/APSA/GMcCarthyfinal.pdf.
Mulvey, Laura (1975): “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, Screen, 16.3, 6-18.
Olsen, Christine (2002): Rabbit-Proof Fence. The Screenplay. Sydney, Currency Press.
Pilkington-Garimara, Doris (1996): Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence, St. Lucia: U. of Queensland P. (N. York, Miramax Books, 2002).
Potter, Emily y Kay Schaffer (2004): “Rabbit-Proof Fence Relational Ecologies and The Commodification of Indigenous Experience”, Australian Humanities Review, 31-32. http//www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-April-2004/schaffer.html.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988): “Can the subaltern speak?” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. C. Nelson y Larry Grossberg. Urbana: U. of Illinois Press, 271-313.
Watson, Christine (2002): “Nugi Garimara (Doris Pilkington) Interviewed by Christine Watson”, Hecate, 1 mayo 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.