Language, Ontology and Intertheoretical Relationships: In favor of a Genuine Ontological Pluralism

Authors

  • Olimpia Lombardi CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.747n1005

Keywords:

Inter-theoretical relationships, reduction, emergence, functional relationships, ontological pluralism, Kantian realism

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to discuss the problem of intertheoretical relationships from the perspective of an ontological pluralism based on a Kantian rooted realism. For this purpose we begin by recalling the classical concept of reduction and its shortcomings, stressing the metaphysical assumptions involved in such conception. Next, we analyze another outspread position that conceives intertheoretical relations in terms of functional relationships, in order to underline certain misguided conclusions usually drawn from that kind of relationship. This task leads us to point out a problem usually ignored in these discussions, the problem about the way in which the system under study is defined. Finally, we introduce a general characterization of our Kantian rooted ontological pluralism, and try to show how this pluralism, in its synchronic version, allows us to face the problem of inter-theoretical relations in a philosophically fruitful way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calzetta, Esteban A., Bei Lok Hu y Francisco D. Mazzitelli (2001): “Coarse-Grained Effective Action and Renormalization Group Theory in Semiclassical Gravity and Cosmology”, Physics Reports 352: 459-520. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00043-6

Castagnino, Mario, Roberto Laura y Olimpia Lombardi (2007): “A General Conceptual Framework for Decoherence in Closed and Open Systems”, Philosophy of Science, a aparecer en número a designar.

El Hani, Charbel N. (2004): “Os Debates sobre a Emergéncia de Propriedades: Onde Estamos Atualmente?”, en Rabossi, Eduardo (ed.), La Mente y sus Problemas. Temas Actuales de Filosofía de la Psicología, Buenos Aires: Catálogos.

Feyerabend, Paul K. (1962): “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism”, en Herbert Feigl and George Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 3, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 28-97.

Kant, Immanuel (1781): Critique of Pure Reason, traducción de N. Kemp Smith, Nueva York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1976): “Theory-Change as Structure-Change: Remarks on the Sneed Formalism”, Erkenntnis 10: 179-199. doi:10.1007/BF00204969

Lombardi, Olimpia y Martín Labarca (2005): “The Ontological Autonomy of the Chemical World”, Foundations of Chemistry 7: 125-148. doi:10.1007/s10698-004-0980-6

Lombardi, Olimpia y Martín Labarca (2006): “The Ontological Autonomy of the Chemical World: A Response to Needham”, Foundations of Chemistry 8: 81-92. doi:10.1007/s10698-005-9004-4

Lombardi, Olimpia y Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz (2007): Los múltiples mundos de la ciencia (volumen en preparación).

Moulines, C. Ulises (1984): “Ontological Reduction in the Natural Sciences”, en Balzer, Wolfgang, David A. Pearce y Heinz-Jürgen Schmidt (eds.), Reduction in Science, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 51-70.

Moulines, C. Ulises (1991): Pluralidad y recursión, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Nagel, Ernst (1961): The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Omnès, Roland (1999): Understanding Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Pérez Ransanz, Ana Rosa (1999): Kuhn y el cambio científico, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Pérez Ransanz, Ana Rosa y J. Francisco Álvarez (2004): “De Kant a Kuhn, acotando por Putnam”, Éndoxa 18: 495-517.

Primas, Hans (1998): “Emergence in Exact Natural Sciences”, en Farre, George L. y Tarkko Oksala (eds.), Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica 91: 83-98.

Putnam, Hilary (1981): Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Los números de página corresponden a la versión castellana Razón, Verdad e Historia, Madrid: Tecnos, 1988.

Putnam, Hilary (1987): The Many Faces of Realism, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. Los números de página corresponden a la versión española Las mil caras del realismo, Barcelona: Paidós, 1994.

Quine, Willard van Orman (1960): Word and Object, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Quine, Willard van Orman (1969): Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.

Rohrlich, Fritz (2001): “Cognitive Scientific Realism”, Philosophy of Science 68: 185-202. doi:10.1086/392872

Scerri, Eric R. y Lee McIntyre (1997): “The Case for the Philosophy of Chemistry”, Synthese 111: 213-232. doi:10.1023/A:1004949814965

Sklar, Lawrence (1967): “Types of Intertheoretic Reduction”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18: 109-12. doi:10.1093/bjps/18.2.109

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1973): Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer (trad. castellana: Estructura y dinámica de teorías, Barcelona: Ariel, 1983).

Torretti, Roberto (2005a): Manuel Kant, Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.

Torretti, Roberto (2005b): “Conocimiento Discursivo”, Lección Inaugural dictada en la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona el 28 de abril de 2005, en ocasión de la investidura del autor como Doctor Honoris Causa de dicha Universidad.

Downloads

Published

2011-02-28

How to Cite

Lombardi, O., & Pérez Ransanz, A. R. (2011). Language, Ontology and Intertheoretical Relationships: In favor of a Genuine Ontological Pluralism. Arbor, 187(747), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.747n1005

Issue

Section

Articles