Roman Jakobson’s cinematographic thinking

Authors

  • Alfonso Puyal Departamento de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad I. Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. Universidad Complutense de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.748n2019

Keywords:

Roman Jakobson, film theory, linguistics, poetics, avant-garde

Abstract


The article turns on the film theory outlined by the Russian linguist from three contributions: the essay “Is the Film in Decline?” (1933); the interview on cinema realized in 1967; and some comments disseminated in its writings. The hypothesis that raises Roman Jakobson is the transposition of the literary features to the cinematographic mean, until rising what the Russian formalists came in calling “Poetics of Cinema” (Poetika Kino). In this sense, the most revealing contribution is the study of the metonimic and metaphorical functions that the cinema unfolds from the segmentation and the assemblage. A panoramic one by the relations that maintained Jakobson with the poets and painters of the Czech and Russian avant-garde, their culture in film matter (movies, filmmakers), or the theoretical references that handled in film questions are some of the themes undertaken with the aim to contextualize the vision that Jakobson had of cinematographic medium. The thickness of the article will be centered in its article of 1933 on movies, writing as a result of the consequences of the sound in the film language, as well as of a small experience in the making of the movies during its stay in the Czech Republic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beavin, Janet, Jackson, Don, Watzlawick, Paul [1967] (2006): Teoría de la comunicación humana: interacciónes, patologías y paradojas, Barcelona, Herder.

Brant, Peter Aage (2005): Spaces, Domains and Meaning: Essays in Cognitive Semiotics, Bern, Peter Lang.

Carrouges, Michel (1974): “K l’accusateur”, Obliques, n.º 3, pp. 28-36.

Cobos, Juan, Pruneda, José Antonio, Rubio, Miguel (1999): “Antes de las campanadas. Primer encuentro con O. Welles que cumplía 49 años”, en Nickel Odeon, n.º 16, pp. 82-127.

Deleuze, Gilles (1985): Cinéma 2. L’imagetemps, Paris, Minuit.

Derrida, Jacques (1967): De la grammatologie, Paris, Minuit.

Fontanille, Jacques, et Zilberberg, Claude (1998): Tension et signification, Liège, Mardaga.

Foucault, Michel (2008): Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión, Madrid, Siglo XXI.

Girard, René (1984): Literatura y mimesis, Barcelona, Gedisa.

Greimas, Algirdas-Julien (1987): De l’imperfection, Périgueux, Pierre Fanlac.

Laing, Ronald David (2004): El yo y los otros, México, FCE.

Landowski, Eric (1997): Présences de l’autre, Paris, PUF.

Landowski, Eric (2004): Passions sans nom, Paris, PUF.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1976) [1945]: Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris, Gallimard.

Parret, Herman (2006): Épiphanies de la présence, Limoges, PULIM.

Petitot, Jean (2004): Morphologie et esthétique, Paris, Maisonneuve et Larose.

Tore, Gian Maria (2007): “La gaya ciencia de la traducción y adaptación cinematográfica”, en Anthropos, n.º 216, pp. 83-90.

Trias, Jean-Philippe (2005): Le procès, Paris, Le Senil.

Downloads

Published

2011-04-30

How to Cite

Puyal, A. (2011). Roman Jakobson’s cinematographic thinking. Arbor, 187(748), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.748n2019

Issue

Section

Articles