What is culture in «cultural economy»? Defining culture to create measurable models in cultural economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2017.783n1007Keywords:
Culture, evolution of culture, cultural economics, cooperation, status, psychologyAbstract
The idea of culture is somewhat vague and ambiguous for the formal goals of economics. The aim of this paper is to define the notion of culture better so as to help build economic explanations based on culture and therefore to measure its impact in every activity or beliefs associated with culture. To define culture according to the canonical evolutionary definition, it is any kind of ritualised behaviour that becomes meaningful for a group and that remains more or less constant and is transmitted down through the generations. Economic institutions are founded, implicitly or explicitly, on a worldview of how humans function; culture is an essential part of understanding us as humans, making it necessary to describe what we understand by culture correctly. In this paper we review the literature on evolutionary anthropology and psychology dealing with the concept of culture to warn that economic modelling ignores intangible benefits of culture rendering economics unable to measure certain cultural items in the digital consumer society.
Downloads
References
Axelrod, R. y Hamilton, W. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, pp. 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396 PMid:7466396
Baumol, W. y Bowen, W. (1965). On the Performing Arts: The Anatomy of their Economic Problems. The American Economic Review, 55, 1/2, pp. 495-502.
Baumol, W. y Bowen, W. (1966). Performing Arts. The Economic Dilemma. A Study of Problems Common to Theater, Opera, Music and Dance. New York: The MIT Press.
Bear, A. y Rand, D. (2016). Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America. 113, 4, pp. 936-941. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517780113 PMid:26755603 PMCid:PMC4743833
Benkler, Y. (2007). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press. PMid:17270051 PMCid:PMC1797018
Boswijk, A. Thijssen, T. y Peelen, E. (2007). The Experience Economy: A New Perspective. Amsterdam: Pearson.
Christakis, N. y Fowler, J. (2010). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York. Little Brown and Company.
Cohen, M. y Sundararajan, A. (2015). Self- Regulation and Innovation in the Peer-to-Peer Sharing Economy. Dialogue. The University of Chicago Law Review, 82, pp. 116-133. Disponible en http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev_online/vol82/iss1/8
Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M., Hernán González, R., Kujal, P. y Rassenti, S. (2016). To Trust, or Not to Trust: Cognitive Reflection in Trust Games. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, pp. 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.09.008
Gibson, N. y Klocker, N. (2003). Cultural industries and cultural policy: a critique of recent discourses in regional economic development. En Gao, J., Le Heron, R. and Logie, J. (eds). Windows on a changing world. Proceedings of the 22nd New Zealand Geographical Society Conference. Auckland: New Zealand Geographical Society, pp. 131-135. PMid:12652066
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science. 162, pp. 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
Holden, J. (2004). The value of culture cannot be expressed only with statistics. Audience numbers give us a poor picture of how culture enriches us. London: Demos. [En línea]. Disponible en http:// www.demos.co.uk/files/CapturingCulturalValue.pdf
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C. Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R. y Read Montague, P. (2005). Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange. Science, 308, pp. 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108062 PMid:15802598
Kroeber, A. y Kluckohn, C. (1952). Culture. A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitons. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. PMCid:PMC1063650
Laland, K. (2017). Darwin's Unfinished Symphony: How Culture Made the Human Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884872
Lessig, L. (2002). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York. Vintage
Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making Art and Comerce Thrive in The Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849662505
Moggridge, D. (2005). Keynes, the Arts and the State. History of Political Economy, 37, 3, pp. 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-37-3-535
Odling-Smee, F., Laland, K. y Feldman, M. (2003). Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princepton University Press.
Preston, S., Kringelbach, M. y Knutson, B. (2014). Introduction: Toward an Interdisciplinary Science of Consumption. En Preston, S., Kringelbach, M. y Knutson, B. (eds). The Interdisciplinary Science of Consumption. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027670.001.0001
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. y Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3, pp. 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
Throsby, D. (2001). Economía y Cultura. Madrid: Akal. PMid:11474577 PMCid:PMC1950042
Throsby, D. (2003). Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us? Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 3-4, pp. 275-285.
Toffler, A. (1984). The Third Wave. New York: Bantam.
Veblen, T. (1899/2001). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. University of Virginia Library.
Wilson, D. S. (2013). Human Cultures Are Primarily Adaptive at the Group Level (with comment). Cliodynamics: The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History, 4, pp. 102-138.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.