Sociologies post ‘68 and social creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.787n1008Keywords:
Creativity, imaginary, artist, social change, burgueois modernity and historyAbstract
This paper analyzes the idea of social creativity in relation to the events of May ‘68. This expression appears as a sociological focus of attention when old structures of bourgeois modernity are broken down and a new self image of postbourgeois man emerges: the artist. The text explains the different meanings of creativity and the dangers that appear in modern society when instituted creativity conceal instituent creativity.
Downloads
References
Bellah, R. N. (2005). What is Axial about the Axial Age? Archives Européennes de Sociologie, XLVI (1), pp. 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975605000032
Boltanski, L. y Chiapello, É. (2002). El nuevo espíritu del capitalismo. Madrid: Akal.
Bröckling, U. (2013). Das unternehmische Selbst. Francfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.
Castoriadis, C. (1988). Los dominios del hombre: las encrucijadas del laberinto. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Castoriadis, C. (1975/1989). La institución imaginaria de la sociedad. Barcelona: Tusquets.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of Modern Mind. Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). The Civilizational Dimension of Sociological Analysis. Thesis Eleven, 62, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513600062000002
Florida, R. (2010). La clase creativa. La transformación de la cultura del trabajo y del ocio en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Paidós.
Heubel, F. (2002). Das Dispositiv der Kreativität. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Hobsbawm, E. (2000). Historia del siglo XX. Barcelona: Crítica.
Jaspers, K. (1965). Origen y meta de la historia. Madrid: Revista de Occidente. PMid:5848130
Joas, H. (1992). Die Kreativität des Handelns. Francfort del Meno: Suhrkamp. PMid:11660113
Joas, H. y Knöbl, W. (2015). Teoría social. Madrid: Akal.
Knöbl, W. (2011). Makrotheorie zwischen Pragmatismus und Historismus. En: Hollstein, B., Jung, M. y Knöbl, W. (eds.). Handlung und Erfahrung. Francfort del Meno / New York: Campus Verlag, pp. 273-315.
Koppetsch, C. (2006). Das Ethos der Kreativen. Constanza: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
Marcuse, H. (1982). Eros y civilización. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
Reckwitz, A. (2010). Das hybride Subjekt. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Reckwitz, A. (2012). Die Erfindung der Kreativität. Francfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.
Reckwitz, A. (2015). Ästhetik und Gesellschaft. Ein analytischer Bezugnahmen. En: Reckwitz, A., Prinz, S y Schäfer, H. (eds.). Ästhetik und Gesellschaft. Francfort del Meno: Suhrkamp, pp. 9-52.
Rorty, R. (1991). Contingencia, ironía y solidaridad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Taylor, Ch. (2006). Las fuentes del yo. Barcelona. Paidós.
Toynbee, A. J. (1981). Estudio de la historia (vol. 1). Madrid: Alianza.
Weber, M. (1987). Economía y sociedad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
