Las ligaduras de Ulises o la supuesta neutralidad valorativa de la ciencia y la tecnología
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2005.i716.402Keywords:
Fact and values, Constitutive and contextual values, Gender, KuhnAbstract
According to classic philosophy of science, science is impartial, autonomous and value free. In the base of this conception is a distinction between objective values and subjective values, also denominated cognitive or constituent values and non-cognitive or contextual values. In this paper some critics to the value-free idea of science, their autonomy and impartiality are reviewed; in special it is shown the relevant role that all kind of values carry out in science, and the importance of 'gender' category in performing these analyses, as the different papers in this issue show.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2005-12-30
How to Cite
Pérez Sedeño, E. (2005). Las ligaduras de Ulises o la supuesta neutralidad valorativa de la ciencia y la tecnología. Arbor, 181(716), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2005.i716.402
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
