Hacia un programa de investigación en Sociología de la Innovación

Manuel Fernández Esquinas

doi:10.3989/arbor.2012.753n1001

Autores/as

Manuel Fernández Esquinas Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA) y Red CTI-CSIC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2012.753n1001

Palabras clave:

Innovación, sociología de la ciencia, sociología económica, cultura, instituciones, estructura social, capital social

Resumen

Este artículo realiza un análisis de los rasgos esenciales de la perspectiva sociológica sobre la innovación. El objetivo es ayudar a especificar aquellos conceptos y herramientas analíticas provenientes de la sociología que resultan útiles para estudiar los procesos de innovación económica. La estrategia de exposición comienza especificando los rasgos de esta especialidad a partir de la definición del objeto de estudio, de las influencias de otras especialidades y de los temas de investigación preferentes. Posteriormente se analizan los principales componentes de un programa de investigación en sociología de la innovación. Para ello se emplea la distinción habitual entre cultura y estructura social. En cada uno de estos ámbitos se definen los múltiples aspectos de la vida social que cubren esos conceptos, se indica su importancia para el análisis del fenómeno innovador y se especifican sus implicaciones para este campo de estudio.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abbott, A. (1998): The chaos of disciplines, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Acha, V.; Marsili, O. y Nelson, R. (2004): “What do we know about Innovation? Selected papers from an International Conference in honour of Keith Pavitt”, Research Policy, 33, 9, 1253-1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.001

Berman, E. P. (2008): “Why Did Universities Start Patenting?: Institution-building and the Road to the Bayh-Dole Act”, Social Studies of Science, 38, 6, 36-58.

Bourdieu, P. (1991): La distinción, Madrid: Taurus.

Burt, R. (1992): Structural holes: the social structure of competition, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Brinton, M. C. y Nee, V. (1998): The new institutionalism in sociology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Castells, M. (1997; 2005): La era de la información, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Cole, J. y Cole. S. (1973): Social stratification in science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Colyvas, J. y Powell, W. (2006): “Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science”, Research in Organizational Behaviour, 27, 315-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4

Crane, D. (1975): Invisible Colleges, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

DiMaggio, P. y Powell, W. (1983): “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101

DiMaggio, P. y Powell, W. (Eds.) (1991): The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dooris, M. y Fairweather, J. (1994): “Structure and culture in faculty work: implications for technology transfer”, The Review of Higher Education, 17 (2),161-177.

Drori, G.; Meyer, J.; Ramírez, F. y Schofer, E. (2003): Science in the modern world: institutionalization and globalization, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Edquist, Ch. (2007): “Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges”, en Fagerberg, J. et al. (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ensign, P. (2009): Knowledge sharing among scientists. Why reputation matters for R&D in multinationals firms, Nueva York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D. y Nelson, R. (Eds.) (2007): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fernández Esquinas, M. y Torres Albero, C. (2009): “La ciencia como institución social: clásicos y modernos institucionalismos en la sociología de la ciencia”, Arbor, 738, 663-687.

Garret-Jones, S. y Turpin, T. (2009): “Managing competition between individual and organizational goals in crosssector research and development centres”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 2-33.

Gaston, J. (1978): The reward system in British and American science, New York: Wiley & Sons.

Gillén, M.; Collins, R.; England, P. y Meyer, M. (Eds.) (2003): The new economic sociology. Developments in an emerging field, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Giner, S.; Lamo de Espinosa. E. y Torres Albero, C. (Coords.) (1998): Diccionario de Sociología, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Godin, B. (2010): Innovation, or the decontestation of a political and contested concept, Montreal: Project on the intellectual history of Innovation, Working Paper N.º 9.

Granovetter, M. (1973): “The strength of weak ties”, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225469

Granovetter, M. (1985): “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddeness”, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228311

Granovetter, M. (2005): “The impact of social structure on economic outcomes”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 1, 33-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147958

Hagstrom, W. (1965): The scientific community, Basic Books: New York.

Hull, F. M. (1988): “Inventions from R&D: Organizational Designs for Efficient Research Performance”, Sociology, 2, 393-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038588022003005

Merton, R. K. (1977): La sociología de la ciencia, Madrid: Alianza Universidad.

Merton, R. (1987): “Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebook: establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials”, Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000245

Moore, K. y Frickel, S. (Eds.) (2007): The New Political Economy of Science: Institutions, Networks, Power, Michigan: University of Wisconsin Press.

Mulkay, M. (1976): “Norms and ideology in science”, Social Science Information, 15, 637-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/053901847601500406

Pelz, D. C. y Andrews, F. M. (1967): Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development, New York: Wiley.

Portes, A. (2000): “The resilient significance of class: a nominalist interpretation”, Political Power and Social Theory, 14, 249-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0198-8719(00)80028-9

Portes, A. (2007): “Instituciones y desarrollo: una revisión conceptual, Desarrollo Económico”, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 184, 475-504.

Powell, W. (2007): “The new institutionalism”, en Clegg, S. R y Bailey, J. R. (Eds.): The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Powell, W. y Grodal, S. (2007): “Networks of innovatorsm”, en Fagerberg, J. et al., The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Restivo, S. (1995): “The theory landscape in science studies: sociological traditions”, en Jasanoff, S. et al. (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies, Thousands Oaks, Ca: Sage.

Rogers, E. (1995): The diffusion of innovations, New York: The Free Press.

Scott, R. (2001): Institutions and organizations (Second edition), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Saxenian, A. L. (1996): Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Swedberg, R. (Ed.) (2005): Entrepreneurship. The social science view, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Uzzi, R. (1997): “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness”, Admnistrative Science Quarterly, 42, 464-476.

Verspagen, B. (2007): “Innovation and economic growth”, en Fagerberg, J. et al. (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Walker, G. B.; Kogut, B. y Shan, W. (1997): “Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network”, Organization Science, 8, 109-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.2.109

Zuckerman, H. (1991): “The sociology of science”, en Smelser, N. (Ed.): Handbook of sociology, Londres: Sage.