Public institutions and firm dynamics in cultural industries: the commercial archaeology in Spain

Authors

  • Eva Parga-Dans Instituto de Ciencias del Patrimonio (INCIPIT), CSIC
  • Manuel Fernández Esquinas Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA), CSIC.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2012.753n1009

Keywords:

Economic sociology, innovation, institutional innovation, contract archaeology, knowledge intensive business services, archaeological sector, heritage sector

Abstract


The cultural industries are gaining importance due to its social and economic role in knowledge society. In countries with a rich and ancient history such as Spain it is especially relevant the conservation and management of heritage, not only because its cultural importance, but also because a new business activity has emerged close to it: the sector of commercial archaeology. However, there is an important gap in the understanding of these cultural and heritage services. It is difficult to observe the conditions that shape its emergence, the economic and labour situation of the firms and the opportunities for development of these firms. This article presents a study of Spanish commercial archaeology, a knowledge intensive business service which has grown in close relation with heritage regulations and policies since 1990’s. We explore the emerging process and the current conditions of this sector by using several empirical sources: regulations and policy documents, a census of archaeological companies, and a survey to these companies. The case study illustrates the dynamics created by the public sector and its influence on the creation of a special market, as well as the influences on innovation and economic growth of cultural industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dosi, G.; Fagiolo, G. y Marengo, L. (1998): “Modelli ed evidenza empirica su quel poco che sappiamo dell’apprendimento in mondi che cambiano”, en Vercelli, A. (Ed.), Incertezza, Racionalita e Decisión, II Mulino, Bologna.

Dosi, G.; Orsenigo, L. y Labini, M. (2005): “Technology and the Economy”, en Smelser, J. y Swedberg, R., The Handbook of Economy Sociology, Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 265- 271.

Edquist, C. (2005): “Systems of Innovation. Perspectives and Challenges”, en Nelson et al., The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 181-208.

Eurostat (2007): Cultural Statistics 2007, Luxemburgo, Eurostat Pocketbooks. Foray, D. (2004): The Economics of Knowledge, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Freeman, C. (1987): Technology, Policy and Economic Performance: lessons from Japan, New York, Frances Printer Publishers.

Frey, L.; Botan, C. y Kreps, G. (2000): Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods, 2.ª ed., Boston, Allyn & Bacon.

González López, M. (2007): A innovación nos servizos a empresas intensivos en coñecemento e os servizos a empresas intensivos en coñecemento na innovación. A diversidade da innovación: unha perspectiva sectorial, Santiago de Compostela, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Granovetter, M. (1985): “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91(3): 481-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228311

Greffe, X. (1990): La valeur économique du patrimoine, París, Económica.

Gregersen, B. (1992): “The Public Sector as a Pacer in National Systems of Innovation”, en Lundvall, B., National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers, pp. 133-150.

Lundvall, B. A. (1992): National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers.

Malerba, F. (1992): “Learning by firms and incremental technical change”, The Economic Journal, Vol, 102, n.º 413, pp. 845-859.

Miles, I. et al. (1995): “Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Users, Carriers and Sources of Innovation”, European Innovation Monitoring System. EIMS Publication, n.º 15, Luxemburgo.

Metcalfe, J. (1998): “Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction”, Journal of Bioeconomics, Vol. 3, n.º 1, pp. 71-77.

Nelson, R. y Winter, S. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard, Belknap Press of Harvard University.

OCDE (2005): Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación, Paris (traducción española-Grupo Tragsa): OCDE http://www.conacyt.gob.sv/Indicadores%20Sector%20Academcio/Manual_de_Oslo%2005.pdf.

Parga-Dans, E. (2011): Innovación y emergencia de un servicio intensivo en conocimiento: El caso de la arqueología comercial, Santiago de Compostela, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Querol, M. y Martínez, B. (1996): La gestión del Patrimonio Arqueológico en España, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

Querol, M. (2010): Manual de Gestión delPatrimonio Cultural, Madrid, Ediciones Akal.

Smelser, N. y Swedberg, R. (2005): The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton, Princeton Universtity Press.

Teece, D. y Pisano, G. (1994): “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction. Industrial an Corporate Change”, Oxford Journals, Vol. 3, n.º 3, pp. 537-556.

Thomi, W. y Böhn, T. (2003): “Knowledge Intensive Business Services in Regional Systems of Innovation-Initial Results from the Case of Southeast-Finland”, 43.º European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Finland.

Vence Deza, X. y González López, M. (2009): “Concentración Regional de los Servicios a Empresas Intensivos en Conocimiento en España”, Papeles de Economía Española, 120: 300- 318.

Vicente Hernández, E. (2007): Economía del Patrimonio Cultural y Políticas Patrimoniales. Un Estudio de la Política del Patrimonio Arquitectónico en Castilla y León, Madrid, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.

Windrum, P. y Thomlinson, M. (1998): “The Impact of KIBS on International Competitiveness: A UK-Netherlands Comparison”,SI4S Topical Paper, n.º 10, STEP Group.

Downloads

Published

2012-02-28

How to Cite

Parga-Dans, E., & Fernández Esquinas, M. (2012). Public institutions and firm dynamics in cultural industries: the commercial archaeology in Spain. Arbor, 188(753), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2012.753n1009

Issue

Section

Articles